In addition to console packages, I may run check automation for numerous platforms and {hardware} gadgets and automate the CI/CD workflow to construct a strong utility. Different checks included API testing, load testing, browser testing and acceptance testing that consider if the code will work in an atmosphere or not.
As soon as I set a check design and sort, I sat again and began the automation. From nitpicking my runtime errors to giving a real-life check simulation, it eased the standard assurance course of with out a lot handbook intervention.
How did I discover and consider the perfect automation testing software program?
I spent weeks attempting and analyzing numerous automation testing instruments to the perfect of my capacity throughout numerous working methods. I additionally used AI to slender down options, professionals and cons, and real-time critiques to provide an accurate image of every automation testing software. Additional, I additionally referred to the proprietary G2 rating for every of those instruments and different extra parameters like buyer sentiments, ease of use, ease of price range, ease of admin, and market presence to ascertain the authority of all these particular person instruments and talked about real-user critiques to your knowledgeable decision-making.
My tackle fundamental options for automation testing software program
Whereas I ran check automation for debugging, builders have a complete set of tasks. Not solely are they required to debug written code, however in addition they management numerous purposes for front-end and back-end synchronization. Whereas some check automation providers eased my worries, I experimented with extra technical and developer-focused options that may enhance enterprise effectivity.
Having these fundamental functionalities for testing shall be useful in case you are seeking to spend money on a check automation system for the long term. No software program from this record would improve your workload or create a problematic situation of flawed check output to your groups.
As I used to be on a hiatus from writing code, I turned a little bit hesitant to place collectively this record initially, pondering I may not know sufficient. However, surprisingly, as I created checks myself, I acquired a good suggestion of which potential providers will profit your IT and dev groups.
- Assist for parallel check execution: Instruments that automated a number of check circumstances proved environment friendly in decreasing developer’s time-to-production. For 2 packages I wrote and executed with completely different programming languages, it was simple to execute concurrently and enhance high quality outcomes.
- Sturdy integration with CI/CD pipelines: I seemed for seamless integration with Jenkins, Gitlab CI, or Azure DevOps. This allowed me to set off checks routinely on each code commit, making certain high quality at each step of the event cycle. As builders constantly operationalize manufacturing by manually integrating prototypes with actual manufacturing environments, automation testing software program ought to automate the testing integration and CI/CD course of to make sure a easy circulation of the software program improvement lifecycle.
- Take a look at selection and check suggestions: As organizations have numerous system consoles and net improvement processes, I looked for software program that gives various check sorts and check varieties to debug and compile notebooks in numerous languages. In the course of the automation course of, it is usually essential for the tester (on this case, me) to judge whether or not the check adopted all the appropriate steps. Recording and replaying check steps, together with getting check suggestions, is essential to enhancing iterative outcomes and fine-tuning the code.
- Complete reporting and analytics: Having personalized studies that entail check tensions, check rounds, check design sort, and bug manufacturing in actionable metrics was helpful, as I may repair sure strains within the code after referring to that information. This helped me rapidly establish check failures and traits to deal with new exceptions and write higher checks throughout completely different platforms.
- Cross-platform and cross-browser compatibility: It was additionally crucial for me that the code undergo browser testing, load testing, and API testing earlier than getting revealed within the runtime atmosphere. Having cross-platform and cross-browser compatibility ensures that your supply code integrates along with your net stack or system stack and that your UI code is appropriate with the net browser atmosphere to launch new options or updates with out operating checks once more.
- Superior scripting and check upkeep capabilities: Constructing scripts for every particular person program will get a little bit messy and ends with you re-declaring check capabilities or managing new check information. With superior scripting, the checks I executed had been recorded, and scripts had been saved to be reused for different builders working with completely different software program algorithms. I additionally most well-liked options with reusable check elements, AI/ML assist, and modular check creation, personalizing new checks as the applying evolves.
The record under incorporates real consumer critiques from the automation testing instruments class on G2. It is vital to notice that distributors providing a free trial are additionally thought of free on this context.
To be included on this class, an answer should:
- Execute software program checks
- Run consequence studies
- Examine outcomes to earlier checks
- Perform checks a number of occasions in a day.
*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques might have been edited for readability.
1. Keysight Eggplant
I began my check automation journey with Keysight Eggplant, which offered pre-built scripting and AI-based check automation as a part of its automation suite.
I discovered the software extraordinarily user-friendly and straightforward to navigate when operating checks for my code. This was very true once I wrote UI checks for my net and cellular purposes to verify compatibility throughout completely different gadgets. One factor that stood out was its image-based automation, which acknowledged the visuals in my code and examined whether or not they labored on the front-end interface.
As an alternative of relying solely on code, Keysight Eggplant let me automate visible parts to check graphical consumer interfaces and dynamic content material. I may parse the venture information with built-in optical character recognition (OCR) functionality, which pulled textual content from picture code and verified its authenticity.
Keysight Eggplant supplied extra versatility and agility as I may launch and check my code in a number of studios and environments. It is not only for net apps; I can use it for numerous platforms. Whether or not I’m testing cellular apps, browsers, desktop software program, and even complicated enterprise methods, the checks run easily.
It additionally supplies a big selection of scripting languages, reminiscent of C++, Python, or JavaScript, that can be utilized to run checks on any platform or working system.
That mentioned, there are just a few areas the place I felt the platform nonetheless requires exterior human help. First off, the pricing is a bit steep as testing instruments are designed for large-scale community architectures for enterprises. In case you are sure that you’ve a various improvement workflow and rigorous testing process, it turns into a good selection. But when that is not the case, this is able to result in a price range overhaul.
Whereas the core options are intuitive, just a few are extraordinarily technical, and I needed to discuss with their assist documentation to higher perceive them.
However right here is the factor: the customer support staff was responsive, and that led to the short decision of my queries, which made my testing course of even smoother and faster.
What I like about Keysight Eggplant
- Keysight Eggplant helped me design and run the checks with out assist from an exterior inspector software to verify scripts.
- AI-powered automation lowered the trouble in initializing completely different checks or writing new UI checks.
What G2 customers like about Keysight Eggplant
“Eggplant is a good software for UI automation. It is really easy to be taught and use. The client assist staff is certainly on one other degree, so proactive and supportive. We use it for UI automation on a number of gadgets, therefore making it an intensive and game-changing automation platform.
This has lowered testing time and lower down some additional operations value.”
– Keysight Eggplant Evaluation, Brondon F.
What I dislike about Keysight Eggplant
- I struggled with the consumer interface; I needed to take prior tutorials on the testing platform to know it higher.
- I struggled to check my net purposes throughout completely different browsers inside a set turnaround time, because it took lots of time to load and combine the checks with the supply code.
What G2 customers dislike about Keysight Eggplant
“The GUI window is not editable. DAI check captures, and stuff would not work. The executable license is simply command-line pushed; it will be very good to have a GUI to drag up and schedule a check by, cross required parameters, and many others. OR even permit the consumer to create a GUI window that’s costume to the script being known as to permit the consumer to configure and schedule a check for that script by it. FIX the handbook in order that it’s searchable once more! it was nice, after which they broke it, and now it is horrible.”
– Keysight Eggplant, jessica h.
Construction, design, and write checks in numerous app programming languages to your community database structure and enhance manufacturing effectivity.
2. The UiPath Platform
The UiPath Platform supplied core consumer interface and graphical testing to double confirm every visible and textual content aspect and assess the accuracy of the backend code.
It additionally supplied drag-and-drop parts with the primary pocket book interface, which connected new scripts and capabilities with every supply code as I designed a number of automation workflows. I’m not a hardcore coder, so having a visible workflow designer that’s intuitive and user-friendly made automation means much less intimidating.
I used to be impressed by UiPath’s pure language processing (NLP) capabilities and AI integrations. These options derived the context and helped set check circumstances to fulfill each utility’s end-user calls for, which eased the info high quality assurance and manufacturing workflows.
I used UiPath’s automated scripts to create a wide range of checks throughout completely different platforms. Every iterative loop was executed with none lag or error. Plus, bot scheduling and bot efficiency analytics additional lowered the scope of compilation errors and bug copy.
I additionally appreciated the educational assets. UI Path Academy contained a treasure trove of tutorials and certifications. Whether or not you’re a newbie or a complicated consumer, there’s something for everybody.
After all, no platform is ideal, and UI Path does face its personal challenges. For starters, the automation campaigns shouldn’t be left unattended, as there’s a chance of a check mix-up.
Additional, the licensing prices will not be acceptable to a model that works on a decent software program price range. One other hurdle I confronted was the coding necessities for extra complicated workflows. Whereas the drag-and-drop instruments are incredible, there are occasions when you could declare objects or new capabilities to execute the check in the identical app improvement language.
It was arduous to get by to customer support groups and resolve escalations. Whereas there’s a ton of documentation obtainable, getting assist for very particular points may be irritating. It takes a substantial amount of time to undergo technical documentation and determine a means out.
What I like about The UI Path Platform
- I liked how we may add information sources throughout the utility creation course of and edit information sources to make our code environment friendly.
- It helped me design cross-platform checks and consider how the applying would carry out in numerous environments.
What G2 customers like about The UI Path Platform,
“The Smartest thing I like about Uipath is its complete strategy to automation, making it a strong software for technical and non-technical customers. It additionally has superior capabilities, permitting customers to automate every thing from easy to complicated duties. Its drag-and-drop interface in Uipath studio makes it accessible to customers with out programming backgrounds.”
– The UIPath Platform Evaluation, Siddharth s Ok.
What I dislike about The UiPath Platform
- I confronted points selecting a selector, as I had chosen a brand new program, and I had to decide on new selectors once more.
- Given the complexity of my code, I discovered it arduous to decide on the appropriate check sort or check situation for which exterior help from the DevOps staff is required.
What G2 customers dislike about UiPath Platform
“Constructing blocks have their downsides, in some complicated situations is difficult to make use of “Out of the field” options or they develop into tough to personalize pushing devs to convey personalised code options, whereas an skilled developer may be capable of simply discover workarounds, jr devs and citizen devs might wrestle and really feel restricted.”
– The UiPath Platform Evaluation, Edwin B.
3. BrowserStack
BrowserStack supplied a novel end-to-end check lifecycle framework and a wide range of check circumstances to manage the affect of check suggestions and record persistent errors in this system.
I liked that BrowserStack supplied numerous check sorts and QA protection to launch checks for native desktop and cellular purposes in numerous environments. I’m not speaking about check emulators or simulators that do not exhibit an utility’s workings. With BrowserStack, I may check and simulate software program’s runtime habits and affect earlier than pushing it right into a manufacturing atmosphere.
It is usually unimaginable how they’ve lined over 3000 device-browser combos. Whether or not I have to verify my app on a legacy browser or cellular working system, BrowserStack has me lined.
I additionally liked the platform’s consumer intuitiveness. All I needed to do was log in, choose a device-browser mixture, and construct my check situations. Plus, it integrates seamlessly with instruments like Selenium, Appium, Cypress, and even CI/CD pipelines to auto-sync the product testing workflows with the dwell tech stack.
Velocity is one other large plus. I may set and automate numerous check designs for numerous elements of the code in a pre-determined method with out touching the automation or attending it as soon as it is lively.
Talking of downsides, I may really feel the feelings of a noncoder as a result of the platform was simply too technical to function. Whereas the platform’s performance is strong, the check descriptions for numerous front-end and back-end packages can confuse you a little bit. It is simple for collaboration, steady integration, and steady software program supply, however even the consumer interface can use some love.
Whereas the integrations are nice, I’ve encountered points, significantly with GitHub, which was a little bit technical for software program library and package deal integration. Typically, the platform can really feel a bit sluggish as properly, particularly throughout peak utilization occasions.
In the event you work in a staff, BrowserStacks subscriptions would possibly really feel overtly priced and restrictive. They do not provide multi-user entry for small groups until you’re prepared to pay a better tier plan.
What I like about BrowserStack
- I liked the app automation characteristic, which helped me set pre-conditions for brand new checks and design check situations with minimal human supervision.
- I may simply run my checks throughout numerous working methods, testing environments, and gadgets and launch my utility.
What G2 customers like about BrowserStack
“Actually, BrowserStack is like having a full-blown system lab in your pocket with out the litter. The truth that I can check on dozens of gadgets – outdated iPhones, shiny new Androids, regardless of the newest Chrome or Safari model is – with out leaving my desk is a game-changer. I additionally love that it’s all within the cloud, so no clunky software program installs. For somebody juggling too many tasks, it’s an enormous time saver. Plus, their dwell testing is tremendous slick – simply hop in, choose a tool/browser combo, and growth, you’re testing like a professional. It’s additionally helped me look smarter in conferences, which, let’s face it, all of us want typically.”
– BrowserStack Evaluation, Dallas C.
What I dislike about BrowserStack
- I discovered the plans a little bit steep in case you are not utilizing or testing a number of codes day by day.
- Typically, the platform turned a little bit sluggish and laggy and crashed or rendered inaccurate checks throughout execution.
What G2 customers dislike about BrowserStack
“We are able to do virtually every thing with BrowserStack in UI testing. Nevertheless, it doesn’t have assist for API testing, Automation, or Guide. It ought to embrace some options for testing of APIs as properly.”
– BrowserStack Evaluation, Ankit Singh P.
In case you are struggling to ascertain a strong testing and QA course of, put together to rent the appropriate software program developer to manage and deploy correct customized check experience.
4. Take a look at IO
Take a look at IO guarantees to ship a one-stop automation and validation workflow, principally as a result of it provides centralized check information administration and check designs for each coders and non-coders.
Once I began utilizing Take a look at IO, the very first thing that struck me was how intuitive and user-friendly the platform felt. It’s designed to simplify testing workflows for busy groups, making it virtually easy to dive into check creation and administration with out going by a steep studying curve.
What units Take a look at IO aside for me is its crowd-testing capacity for responsiveness on cross-functional platforms. The platform related my venture to an unlimited community of testers so I may get real-time suggestions from builders and testers in various environments and markets.
I liked the iterative check recording and suggestions characteristic, which enabled me to manage the applying’s consequence throughout a number of working methods, gadgets, and cloud servers.
Establishing checks was easy: I needed to pre-set check circumstances, establish selectors, and run unattended automation. They embrace customizable and sturdy integration instruments, so I’m not caught constructing checks from scratch.
Plus, Take a look at IO’s integration with platforms like Jira and GitHub helps streamline workflows by permitting me to trace bugs and handle duties with out leaping on a number of platforms.
There are just a few areas the place Take a look at IO may have been higher. Whereas it is incredible for easy check setups, I’ve observed that the platform can really feel a bit restricted when attempting to create extremely tailor-made or extremely area of interest check situations.
Moreover, I did expertise efficiency hiccups, reminiscent of sluggish response occasions whereas setting check scripts or navigating by the dashboard.
With so many capabilities and options packed into the platform, it’s simple to overlook out on some superior options or check nuances until you exit of your means for them.
Subscription-wise, Take a look at IO supplied a variety of plans tailor-made to various backgrounds. As somebody who likes an easy improve path, I would admire a extra user-friendly and clear subscription course of for firms and people.
All in all, Take a look at IO is designed to simplify your testing and QA workflows whereas making certain that your testing area is roofed and simplifies your improvement setups for builders and testers.
What I like about Take a look at IO
- It’s simple to arrange checks, and I can reuse scripts from one check code to a different for sooner execution.
- I may simply observe bugs throughout the iterative check suggestions loops and optimize the testing course of.
What G2 customers like about Take a look at IO
“The whole means of utilizing Take a look at IO was extremely user-friendly, and as a product proprietor, I felt supported by the Take a look at.io staff each step of the way in which. As a small staff, we’ve restricted assets, however Take a look at.io made it simple to arrange checks and push the outcomes alongside to our builders whereas additionally saving one of the beneficial assets: my time.”
– TestIO Evaluation, Kate W.
What I dislike about Take a look at IO
- With low-code automation, I could not arrange various check designs for my code.
- It did assist app testing and browser testing; however did not have assist for API testing and cargo testing.
What G2 customers dislike about Take a look at IO
“There’s a low capacity to customise the testing course of to be tremendous particular; it forces you to make your checks a particular means, which is helpful for reusability and understanding, however not useful when you might have a posh or particular course of it is not able to.”
– Take a look at IO Evaluation, William G.
5. Lambda Take a look at
LambdaTest supplies specialised information construction and node administration options for object-oriented languages like C++, Python, and Java to scale back compilation hassles for builders.
Lambda Take a look at has been an actual recreation changer as a result of it’s so simple to implement checks for net browser compatibility. With Lambda Take a look at, I may check cross-platform compatibility for Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and even older variations of Web Explorer.
Although I used to be new to testing, I may leap proper in and execute my software program code with ease and automate your entire course of with pre-defined check scripts. Options like a live-testing dashboard made it easy to change between completely different browsers and gadgets seamlessly.
LambdaTest can also be built-in with Selenium, Cypress, and Playwrite to execute complicated checks like acceptance testing and visible simulation for consumer interfaces throughout completely different platforms. It additionally saved me lots of time by operating regression checks and managing the applying’s habits.
Nevertheless, I encountered some system downtime and sluggish interface points. Throughout peak hours, the system was a bit unresponsive and continuously lagged throughout automation.
Ready for a check to load is irritating in case you work on a decent deadline. Whereas the automation options had been strong, I want they had been extra superior. Including capabilities like visible regression or picture recognition with AI may have made the system a bit higher.
Total, LambdaTest is an ideal resolution for non-coders who foray into the world of software program testing, and it was handy, simple to know, and deploy for me and my manufacturing groups.
What I like concerning the Lambda Take a look at
- I may simply run my code in a cross-browser runtime atmosphere and verify its agility and suitability for various working system variations.
- I liked the immediate customer support throughout net and cellular testing points, which resolved my queries a lot sooner.
What G2 customers like about Lambda Take a look at
“I admire LambdaTest’s characteristic set for desktop testing, together with Responsive Testing, Community Throttling, Screenshot Testing, and IP Geolocation, which make cross-browser testing easy and environment friendly. The Ease of Use and Developer Instruments are nice for rapidly debugging points, and the Ease of Integration with instruments like Selenium provides to its versatility. The responsive Buyer Assist can also be an enormous plus, addressing questions and points promptly.”
– Lambda Take a look at Evaluation, Apoorva M.
What I dislike concerning the Lambda Take a look at
- I may discover some points throughout cellular testing, as integrations to Apple Pay and GPS monitoring had been unavailable.
- I struggled with session durations for particular checks and located that operating checks on the free model can take a little bit longer.
What G2 customers dislike about Lambda Take a look at
“The preliminary configuration is usually a bit difficult to know. It took me a while to navigate the setup course of, however as soon as that hurdle was cleared, the remainder of the expertise was easy.”
– Lambda Take a look at Evaluation, Bruno C.
Discover the proper net browser atmosphere to execute and launch new net purposes, get rid of display or backend inconsistencies, and supply an uninterrupted consumer expertise.
6. Katalon Platform
I discovered the Katalon Platform supplied a centralized testing dashboard for operating check campaigns for various methods and net purposes. It additionally scrutinized code with AI-augmented high quality administration to optimize end-user expertise with much less effort.
Katalon Platform made product testing and software program debugging simple to know with drag-and-drop check automation. It additionally supplied built-in spy and file functionalities, which enabled me to watch each operate, thread, and object declaration throughout testing.
Whereas it is full of instruments you’d anticipate from a premium automation platform, particular technical options stood out to me. Capturing UI parts was easy, even once I needed to check dynamic net elements and responsive graphical consumer interfaces for my net and cellular purposes.
One characteristic that impressed me was Katalon’s data-driven testing functionality. By connecting with exterior information sources like Excel and databases, I may run checks on the identical check situations with out having to rewrite something.
Katalon Platform additionally gave me full check protection with its keyword-driven framework. It got here with pre-built key phrases that made frequent duties like clicking parts, verifying textual content, or managing pop-ups simple throughout automation campaigns.
As well as, I managed to automate check workflows throughout net, cellular, API, and desktop purposes.
That mentioned, I did encounter some roadblocks throughout setting automation. Integrating Katalon with some open-based instruments required additional effort, which hindered my expertise.
There have been frequent points configuring and deploying Katalon’s Runtime Engine (KRE) through the command-line interface. Whereas this characteristic was nice for executing CI/CD pipelines, it might skew your total organizational price range.
Moreover, I did discover some efficiency sluggishness all through the testing course of. Scrolling by check circumstances or loading costly tasks felt a little bit sluggish, which may very well be irritating. It will have been nice to get a thorugh check abstract on the finish, which was not the case.
Total, I really feel like Katalon supplied every thing in a single place: data-driven testing, check studies, and API assist. Nevertheless, extra thoroughness and attentiveness all through the automation course of can be good to usher in extra agility and sturdy capacity.
What I like concerning the Katalon Platform
- I liked the data-driven testing, which summarized check outcomes and outcomes after each check iteration.
- I may additionally add the results of the execution of the check suite into the cloud and stabilize the applying operate.
What G2 customers like concerning the Katalon Platform
“One software does all of it! WebUI, API (SOAP/REST), Native, Cellular, parallel executions, multi-browser, Git interoperability, Eclipse built-in information atmosphere (IDE), and many others. Assist is nice, too. I like that it helps all ranges of customers, from fast recording/playback and key phrases to skilled builders who want every thing. I’ve used Katalon on daily basis for the previous three years and it is head and shoulders over its competitors… and I have been growing check automation for 33 years, so I do know what I am saying right here!”
– Katalon Evaluation, Graham E.
What I dislike concerning the Katalon Platform
- I discovered the primary check interface complicated and needed to scroll to view all of the choices to set my check case.
- It was arduous to arrange and configure Katalon for cellular testing as the method appeared a little bit complicated.
What G2 customers dislike concerning the Katalon Platform
“The draw back of Katalon is, it’s important to pay for a license if you could do CI/CD integration, Visible testing, Limitless Analytical outcomes on TestOps (plugin to point out execution consequence).”
– Katalon Platform Evaluation, Monish p.
Automation testing instruments: Continuously answered questions (FAQs)
Which automation testing software is in demand in 2025?
Selenium stays the preferred automation testing software for net purposes, whereas Appium continues to be in demand for cellular testing in 2025.
Which automation testing software is best, Selenium or Playwright?
There can’t be a testing software that works higher than the opposite. Selenium is best for cross-browser testing and in depth neighborhood assist, whereas Playwright excels in sooner execution, trendy looking assist, and built-in options like auto-waiting to execute software program checks seamlessly.
Which is the perfect free automation testing software?
At the moment, Keysight Eggplant and UiPath platforms are two main instruments within the automation testing instruments class on G2 for highly effective native GUI testing throughout cellular and net purposes.
Which is the perfect automation testing software that you should utilize with no coding?
You’ll be able to combine automation testing instruments into your CI/CD pipeline by configuring the check execution in pipeline levels (Jenkins, GitHub levels) utilizing CLI instructions or scripts. Be sure that software program libraries are built-in with the testing campaigns and that check outcomes are captured through the plugins you set.
How do I deal with dynamic parts in automation testing software program?
Dynamic parts are dealt with utilizing methods like XPath, which incorporates and begins with capabilities, HTML and CSS selectors with partial matching, and ready mechanisms like express waits. Instruments like Selenium additionally assist customized selectors that extract and check visible parts.
Which is the perfect automation testing software program for net purposes?
The perfect automation testing software program for net purposes consists of Cypress for contemporary front-end apps, TestComplete for ease of use, Katalon Studio for complete options, and Pupeteer for unattended Chrome Testing.
Do not wait, simply automate
Whether or not it’s a net or cellular improvement course of, I figured that DevOps groups and software program testers have to think about community infrastructure calls for, web connectivity, and the character of the datasets built-in with their dwell code to get a clearer image of which automation testing platform fits them.
As I went by and carried out these software program checks on my code, I noticed that the true IT and DevOps workflows are far more complicated and various. Whereas software program builders are involved with optimizing the software program testing workflows, taking a step again and evaluating all parameters would provide help to make an knowledgeable resolution.
Feeling overwhelmed when selecting the proper software program process to your model? I would urge you to discuss with this trustworthy evaluation of the 10 finest textual content editors in 2025 to develop into a professional at software program programming.
.png)
