What Stood Out In My Evaluation

Some years again, I witnessed a magnanimous safety breach of a trademarked firm web site in my earlier firm, which left the IT group frozen in shock.

Had the menace been detected or analyzed earlier, a correct menace detection and mitigation framework might need prevented the mishap.

It additionally intrigued me to have some talks over tea with my firm’s community engineers and cybersecurity analysts to get intel on the options or advantages they search from the greatest menace intelligence instruments at present.

With their insights, I observed the demand for multi-source information aggregation to create and correlate threats, real-time menace detection and monitoring, automation, AI-driven information privateness, and contextual menace intelligence, that are key options in menace intelligence instruments that may stop disastrous outcomes.

With this define, I sought to investigate and consider 7 greatest menace intelligence instruments out there at present to create and co-relate threats, analyze and mitigate safety dangers and cut back the dependency on handbook groups to extract menace histories and causes. Let’s get into it!

7 greatest menace intelligence instruments: my prime picks

A menace intelligence instrument protects and safeguards a company in opposition to numerous safety dangers, corresponding to cyber assaults, brute pressure assaults, zero-day assaults, and zero-day vulnerabilities. After I began evaluating menace intelligence instruments, my main focus was on which instruments are fitted with the most recent safety protocols to take care of sturdy encryption requirements for a company’s information and supply real-time menace detection.

Whereas evaluating and researching, I famous key parameters {that a} safety group searches for, corresponding to the necessity to gather and correlate menace information from numerous sources, together with open supply intelligence (OSINT), industrial feeds, and inner logs. Patrons additionally search instruments that supply AI-based automation for menace evaluation and contextual menace intelligence to detect ways, strategies, and procedures relating to threats. Whereas menace intelligence instruments establish vulnerabilities, ERM options guarantee these insights feed into company-wide resilience.

My evaluation covers the highest 7 menace intelligence instruments out there, which provide strong safety frameworks to fight any threat of unwarranted threats.

What makes a menace intelligence instrument value it: my opinion 

My evaluation had a singleton conclusion; a instrument that identifies clever patterns of AI-powered cyberattacks or information breaches and alerts the system about potential threats or safety warnings is a perfect menace intelligence instrument.

In accordance with Markets and Markets, the menace intelligence market was estimated at USD 11.55 billion in 2025 and is projected to achieve USD 22.97 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 14.7% in the course of the forecast interval. 

Additional, these methods combine with SIEM instruments, antivirus instruments, and endpoint detection instruments to strengthen the safety posture and establish and mitigate threats sooner.

With a robust concentrate on safety and privateness, I recognized the next essential options that you must look out for in a menace intelligence instrument. 

• Automated menace information aggregation and normalization: After I assess any menace intelligence instrument, the very first thing I guarantee is that it may create and correlate menace information from a number of sources like OSINT, inner logs, and industrial feeds. This was a vital step in contextualizing threats and standardizing menace patterns for sooner evaluation and real-time detection. With out aggregation and normalization, menace information stays chaotic and nearly unusable. A very good instrument unifies this info and saves analysts numerous handbook hours of labor.
• Contextualized menace enrichment: I additionally thought-about which instruments contextualized threats along with sending an alert or warning within the system. A robust menace enrichment module is essential to forecasting and mitigating the menace. The platform should layer crucial metadata, corresponding to attacker ways (MITRE ATT&CK), industries focused, and malware households used, so that you simply aren’t simply seeing what the menace is but in addition why it issues to them particularly. Instruments that fail to do that depart customers flying blind.
• Actual-time menace detection and alerting: Clever snoopers or attackers create new infiltration patterns each second. Which is why a menace intelligence instrument needs to be powered with real-time detection and actionable alerting. Whether or not by way of integrations with SIEMs, SOARs, or standalone dashboards, these instruments ought to combat AI-powered attacking mechanisms with tight protection mitigation methods. With real-time menace detection, you’ll be able to transfer and react at machine velocity and never with a “next-business-day” nature. Alongside menace feeds and enrichment, many organizations depend on prime MDR companies to actively monitor, detect, and reply to evolving assaults. 
• Tailor-made intelligence to your trade and threat profile: In my analysis, these instruments are deemed greatest as a result of they permit you to customise menace feeds and intelligence based mostly in your trade, geography, digital footprint, and particular threat urge for food. Customization ensures that the group will get related, actionable insights and never a truckload of irrelevant alerts with no measurement of threat depth.
• Risk investigation and deep dive analytics module: These instruments wanted to be outfitted with a complicated analytics dashboard to show menace circumstances, menace sources, and menace mitigation information. They even have investigation workbenches the place you’ll be able to pivot between menace indicators, discover assault paths, enrich IPs and domains, and join dots throughout campaigns. Investigative agility makes the distinction between reactive defence and proactive looking. 
• Collaboration, sharing, and reporting capabilities: In a contemporary safety ecosystem, no group operates alone. That is why I shortlisted instruments which have built-in mechanisms for sharing intelligence with inner or exterior groups, organizations, and even ISACs and nationwide cyber alliances to type a sturdy safety infrastructure. Equally vital is automated and customizable reporting in order that safety groups can simply talk threat and impression to management and non-technical stakeholders.

All of it boils all the way down to how a menace intelligence instrument creates menace information, contextualizes threats with forecasting, and catches maintain of good AI-based breaches to set off menace alerts and protection methods to counter dangers.

Instruments that stood out by way of buyer satisfaction, buyer section, and G2 sentiment scoring are the highest menace intelligence instrument contenders on this listing since they’re based mostly on real-time G2 consumer evaluation information.

Out of 30+ greatest menace intelligence instruments that I evaluated, the highest 7 have made it to this listing. The listing beneath accommodates real evaluations from the menace intelligence class web page. To be included on this class, a software program should:

• Present info on rising threats and vulnerabilities.
• Element remediation practices for frequent and rising threats.
• Analyze international threats on several types of networks and gadgets 
• Cater menace info to particular IT options.

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations could have been edited for readability.  

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native endpoint detection and utility safety platform that retains your safety methods updated and defends your on-prem or cloud information in opposition to unwarranted assaults or breaches.

As a class chief on G2 based mostly on 127 verified evaluations, Microsoft Defender for Cloud has an total buyer satisfaction rating of 72, and 90% of customers are more likely to suggest it to others. 

What instantly impressed me was how straightforward it was to combine with my current Azure setup. The preliminary deployment was principally easy; no further configuration is required except you are going deep into hybrid or multi-cloud environments.

It simply clicked with Azure companies, Microsoft 365, and even AWS and GCP, which was a nice shock. Additionally they have a pay-as-you-go subscription mannequin that feels versatile if you’re not prepared for an enormous dedication upfront.

One of many first issues that stood out was the safety rating dashboard. It is like a real-time report card to your cloud posture that highlights vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and dangerous sources. I beloved how detailed it was, breaking down particular person sources inside every subscription and giving clear suggestions for fixing points. 

Generally, if you’re fortunate, you’ll be able to even simply click on “Repair” and it auto-remediates. That saved me a bunch of time. Plus, the mixing with Azure Lively Listing made identification safety tremendous easy.

The distinction between tiers in premium options was fairly noticeable. The free tier offers you fundamentals like safety assessments, suggestions, and coverage administration. Truthfully, that is sufficient to get you began.

However as soon as I upgraded to the usual plan, issues obtained a bit of extra highly effective. I obtained entry to just-in-time VM entry, adaptive utility controls, and community menace detection. The just-in-time entry function is a lifesaver if you happen to work with VMs and want to cut back publicity with out manually shutting issues on and off on a regular basis.

Additionally, there’s one other function generally known as Defender for Servers, a premium plan that stunned me with options like file integrity monitoring (it alerts on file modifications, however typically misses the context of potential malicious exercise). It could be even higher if they might proactively flag behaviours as a substitute of simply logging modifications.

I additionally wish to point out their assist for menace safety, real-time detection, AI-based menace analytics, anti-malware, and anti-phishing. It is particularly nice at monitoring e mail threats, with whitelisting choices that allow you to defend trusted distributors.

Plus, the multi-cloud safety protection is not simply Azure-exclusive; it expands throughout AWS and GCP, providing insights and proposals tailor-made to every cloud.

In accordance with G2 consumer evaluations, Microsoft Defender for Cloud is acknowledged for sturdy multi-cloud safety, although complexity is a recurring theme. Establishing superior options or third-party integrations can take time, and a few customers point out occasional false positives that add noise to alerts.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and value. Superior protections are sometimes tied to higher-tier plans, which can really feel steep for smaller companies. The interface additionally evolves shortly, and whereas highly effective, frequent modifications could make navigation much less intuitive.

General, G2 sentiment displays Microsoft Defender for Cloud as a dependable and strong answer for safeguarding information and monitoring safety postures throughout hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

• Though the instrument supplies endpoint safety for all gadgets, the deployment course of may be very complicated when configuring safety for iOS gadgets. 
• One other gripe I discovered was the pricing. It may possibly shortly change into costly, and the overload of alerts results in false positives. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

“What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the complicated pricing, which might shortly change into costly, and the overload of alerts, usually resulting in false positives. Moreover, the mukti-cloud assist is not as strong for non-azure platforms; the preliminary setups may be sophisticated for groups with out cloud safety setup expertise.”

– Microsoft Defender for Cloud Overview, Archi P.

Recorded Future supplies an entire breakdown of real-time safety breaches or threats, initiates menace mitigation practices, and protects your safety firewall in opposition to snoops or spies.

As a class chief in menace intelligence software program, Recorded Future has achieved an eloquent buyer satisfaction rating of 97, based mostly on 109 evaluations. Round 92% of customers will suggest Recorded Future for intelligence reviews, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

What actually hooked me from the start was how quick and clever it felt—like having an analyst group operating 24/7, always feeding me actionable menace insights. It isn’t simply information dumped from random sources. Recorded Future curates menace intelligence from a powerful mixture of open net, darkish net, closed boards, and technical telemetry, and in some way, all of it is smart.

I can belief the alerts I obtain as a result of they don’t seem to be solely real-time but in addition prioritized based mostly on relevance and impression.

I additionally appreciated the fusion of machine velocity assortment with human-curated evaluation. It means I do not simply get the automated noise; I get contextual and enriched intelligence that I can work on.

This mix actually helps our proactive, intelligence-driven safety operations. The integration with SIEMs and SOAR platforms makes life simpler, too, as all the pieces plugs in seamlessly with out having to create workarounds.

I additionally respect the myriad of options, like their super-detailed menace maps, threat scores, and entity profiles. If you’re in an enormous group, the premium options in upper-tier subscriptions supply much more superior modules like assault floor monitoring, model safety, and geopolitical intelligence. 

Some plans additionally include analyst-on-demand companies, which is nice once I want skilled validation for a fast strategic seek the advice of and recommendation. 

In accordance with G2 consumer evaluations, Recorded Future is revered for its breadth of menace intelligence, although the interface can really feel overwhelming at first. With a lot information flowing in, customers be aware the significance of tuning alerts and filters to keep away from being overloaded.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and have entry. The transfer to a modular mannequin supplies flexibility, however superior capabilities like fraud detection or nation-state monitoring are sometimes tied to premium tiers, which might really feel restrictive for smaller safety groups.

General, G2 sentiment displays Recorded Future as a proactive and intelligence-rich platform that empowers safety groups to detect, analyze, and mitigate threats in actual time.

What I dislike about Recorded Future:

• Whereas Recorded Future gives an entire bundle, it comes with a value. I observed that the superior tier plans require you to pay a hefty quantity. Additionally, that you must pay for every additional API integration, so the licensing mannequin is expensive.
• I additionally discovered that whereas the platform is highly effective, it may be difficult for brand new customers to make the most of and work with it with out in depth coaching. The educational curve is steep, notably for superior options like question builder and integrations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Recorded Future:

“The recorded future has so many various modules that it may be a bit obscure what capabilities my group does and doesn’t have entry to.”

– Recorded Future Overview, Tyler C.

Cyberint is an end-to-end cyber intelligence platform that permits firms to detect, analyze, and examine unwarranted actions and cyber threats earlier than they adversely impression the general privateness community.

Based mostly on 102 verified G2 evaluations, Cyberint has achieved a satisfaction rating of 97, making it a class chief. Additionally, round 93% of customers within the total enterprise section, consisting of small, mid, and enterprise firms, are more likely to suggest Cyberint to others.

I’ve been exploring Cyberint’s Argos Risk Intelligence Platform for fairly a while, and I’ve to say that it’s a blended bag. What actually drew me in at first was how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is. It would not bombard you with jargon or overcomplicated workflows, which is precisely what’s vital when integrating it along with your safety operations.

The instrument’s safety framework was accomplished by real-time menace detection and assault floor monitoring. Inside days, Argos helped our group establish and reply to darkish net threats and model impersonations we did not even know existed.

I additionally appreciated their customizable alert system. Every alert is tagged with the respective menace sort—be it fishing, credential leaks, uncovered property, or suspicious mentions on illicit boards.

The platform would not simply throw information at you; it contextualizes it. We notably benefited from their darkish net intelligence and deep visibility into menace actors’ ways, strategies, and procedures (TTPs). It felt like having a 24/7 menace hunter embedded in our group.

A function I’ve come to depend on closely is Argo’s third-party threat monitoring, which checks for vulnerabilities throughout our vendor ecosystem. This type of foresight has saved us a number of instances from potential publicity. The model safety module is top-notch. It actively screens social media, rogue domains, and faux apps impersonating our enterprise. Truthfully, it’s some of the full suites I’ve seen in a menace intelligence platform.

In accordance with G2 consumer evaluations, Cyberint earns reward for its menace intelligence protection, although some customers discover the API much less mature than anticipated. Integrating into broader SOAR pipelines can really feel restricted, and customization of dashboards and reviews doesn’t at all times present the flexibleness groups need.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round workflow friction and have depth. Copying or sharing visible information like menace graphs isn’t seamless, and some reviewers point out occasional false positives the place filtering and suggestions might be smoother. Some superior capabilities additionally seem tied to higher-tier plans, which isn’t at all times clearly communicated.

General, G2 sentiment displays Cyberint as a complete digital threat safety answer that helps organizations monitor, detect, and defend in opposition to exterior threats with sturdy protection and premium-tier assist.

What I dislike about Cyberint:

• Whereas Cyberint supplies end-to-end alerts about energetic assaults, that you must manually replace the standing of alerts, even when you’ve got accomplished so by way of a SIEM system.
• I additionally observed some minor UI bugs, like alerts not opening in a brand new web page when urgent Ctrl+click on. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Cyberint:

The answer has options that appear to have redundant performance, however nonetheless, such performance remains to be helpful to a company.

One other factor is that the extra options could be a bit regarding by way of the group’s funds. However, if such a burden may be dealt with, I absolutely assist having this answer if you’re in search of a cyber menace intelligence answer

– Cyberint Overview, Gen Hart B.

Crowdstrike Falcon supplies anti-ransomware options to take care of safety benchmarks throughout all of your community gadgets and tech stack. It covers incidents, vulnerabilities, assaults, and malware detection below its belt.

Based mostly on 130+ verified evaluations on G2, CrowdStrike Falcon has achieved a buyer satisfaction score of 76, with over 94% customers prepared to suggest it to others for malware detection, safety validation, and endpoint intelligence.

What instantly stood out to me was how light-weight it’s. It doesn’t bathroom down system efficiency like some older-gen antivirus instruments do. The setup was refreshingly straightforward, too. I used to be in a position to deploy it throughout endpoints with minimal friction, and the unified agent structure meant I didn’t must juggle a number of installs for various modules.

Certainly one of its superpowers is real-time menace detection. CrowdStrike’s cloud-native structure leverages behavioral analytics and AI-based menace intelligence to proactively detect anomalies like ransomware, fileless malware, zero-day assaults, and extra.

I used to be additionally impressed with how briskly it reacts. The Falcon Forestall module (included even within the base plan) already outperforms many conventional AVs, however as quickly as I added Falcon Perception for EDR, I actually noticed the ability of real-time telemetry and investigation. The extent of element it supplies is like having a magnifying glass into your community exercise.

What I additionally respect is the single-agent method. I didn’t must overload machines with totally different endpoint instruments. Whether or not it was vulnerability administration by way of Falcon Highlight, menace looking by way of Falcon OverWatch, or system management, all the pieces built-in seamlessly.

When you go for higher-tier plans like Falcon Enterprise or Falcon Full, you additionally get 24/7 managed menace looking, which, let’s be sincere, is a game-changer when your group is small or overworked. These guys virtually change into your SOC extension.

In accordance with G2 consumer evaluations, CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its sturdy detection and endpoint safety, although pricing is commonly talked about as a barrier. Smaller companies, particularly, be aware that the modular pricing construction can really feel costly as wants increase.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to assist and value. Whereas many interactions with assist are constructive, ticket resolutions can often take longer than anticipated. A couple of reviewers additionally point out false positives and be aware that the Falcon console, whereas highly effective, comes with a studying curve for brand new customers.

General, G2 sentiment displays CrowdStrike Falcon as a market-leading endpoint safety answer that delivers broad protection and superior detection capabilities.

What I dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Safety Platform:

• Though it does a fantastic job of offering alerts and updates, we can’t go into a lot element after we choose the sensor from the system tray.
• I additionally observed that there are numerous screens to handle, it’s laborious to achieve each function, and there’s a want to know computer systems at a excessive degree.

What do G2 customers dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform:

“I am not glad with the pricing in comparison with another options, that are a bit of bit greater, and it has restricted cellular assist.”

– Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform Overview, Bhavanasi N.

Mimecast Superior E mail Safety supplies AI-powered information safety in opposition to email-borne and harmful assaults. It leverages machine studying and social graphing to detect threats in real-time.

Based mostly on 120 verified evaluations on G2, Mimecast has achieved a mean buyer satisfaction rating of 70, with 90% customers prepared to suggest it to others for e mail safety, e mail safety, and safe e mail gateway. 

Mimecast is a instrument that runs quietly within the background, shielding organizations from phishing, malware, spoofing, and impersonation makes an attempt. It not often lets something malicious slip by way of.

The AI-driven safety is legit, I’ve seen it catch some extremely refined impersonation makes an attempt, particularly these tough CEO fraud-style emails that used to fly below the radar.

Certainly one of my favourite options is its real-time hyperlink and attachment scanning. When an e mail hits your inbox, Mimecast doesn’t simply let it move by way of. It actively scans all the pieces embedded within the message. The e-mail continuity function additionally proves helpful. Throughout service outages, Mimecast retains e mail visitors flowing in order that communication would not cease.

I additionally appreciated the admin dashboard, which is stacked with capabilities. Initially, it felt a bit overwhelming, however type of thrilling. When you get previous the preliminary curve, although, it turns into a robust management heart.

You may configure insurance policies all the way down to the smallest element, set granular filtering guidelines, and simply entry logs and menace reviews. I particularly respect the e-mail archiving and e-discovery instruments. They’re clear, searchable, and make regulatory compliance easy.

In accordance with G2 consumer evaluations, Mimecast is revered for its sturdy e mail safety, although false positives are typically talked about as a downside. A couple of customers be aware that professional messages may be flagged as suspicious, and the method of manually whitelisting them isn’t at all times as easy because it might be.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to coverage configuration. Establishing superior insurance policies can take trial and error, and a few reviewers point out intermittent login points throughout administration.

General, G2 sentiment displays Mimecast as a scalable and dependable e mail safety answer that delivers sturdy safety and encryption for organizations dealing with giant volumes of crucial communications.

What I dislike about Mimecast Superior E mail Safety

• Though Mimecast detects any presence of phishing makes an attempt or malware in emails, it may be a bit aggressive with filtering, resulting in false positives that require handbook evaluation.
• One other factor I observed is that Mimecast typically flags professional emails as suspicious, resulting in communication delays.

What do G2 customers dislike about Mimecast Superior E mail Safety:

The draw back is that the assist is a bit of off-putting if you’re previous your implementation section. A few of the guidelines and insurance policies are laborious to configure by way of implementation.

– Mimecast Superior E mail Safety Overview, Jessica C.

ThreatLocker is a good instrument for detecting and capturing undesirable exercise throughout your safety community. It supplies a suite of cybersecurity instruments to scale your information and content material safety workflows and cut back the chance of information breaches or vulnerabilities.

Based mostly on 86 verified evaluations, ThreatLocker has an honest buyer satisfaction common of 91, making it a pacesetter within the class. Additional, a whopping 97% customers will suggest it to others for intelligence reviews, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

I’ve explored a number of safety instruments earlier than, however ThreatLocker stands out, principally as a result of it does what it guarantees. From the start, it was clear that this wasn’t a fundamental antivirus or general-purpose instrument. It is constructed particularly to implement zero belief on the utility degree.

The core function, utility whitelisting, signifies that solely software program we’ve explicitly accepted can run. It offers us fast visibility into unauthorized packages and, in lots of circumstances, stops potential threats earlier than they even begin.

One other function I exploit closely is Ringfencing. It’s not nearly what apps can run but in addition about what they’re allowed to work together with. For instance, I can cease a trusted utility like Microsoft Phrase from launching PowerShell or accessing delicate information directories. This degree of segmentation has helped us stop lateral motion and limit how even accepted instruments can behave.

ThreatLocker’s assist group has been some of the dependable elements of the expertise. Any time we hit a configuration problem or wanted steerage, they have been fast to reply and useful all through. That degree of assist made an actual distinction, particularly within the early days after we have been nonetheless determining learn how to construction insurance policies successfully.

In accordance with G2 consumer evaluations, ThreatLocker is praised for its granular management, although the training curve may be vital. Establishing insurance policies requires time and a focus, as customers have to stability blocking threats with out proscribing professional exercise.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is the quick tempo of updates. Whereas frequent enhancements present the product is evolving, documentation can lag behind, leaving groups to regulate and relearn options extra usually than anticipated.

General, G2 sentiment displays ThreatLocker as a robust safety platform that delivers sturdy coverage enforcement, privilege administration, and compliance-focused auditing.

What I dislike about ThreatLocker:

• Whereas Threatlocker empowers you to enhance your zero-trust method and privileges, it takes a while to fine-tune insurance policies, particularly to start with, and managing approvals could be a little bit of a studying curve.
• Whereas Threatlocker is a sturdy safety instrument, the general studying curve can be steep for customers who should not aware of its interface and sophisticated configurations.

What do G2 customers dislike about ThreatLocker:

“It isn’t a draw back, however ThreatLocker requires time & sources to completely perceive the product and supply wonderful assist to your clients. It isn’t a click on and deploy and by no means take a look at it once more product. That mentioned, we spend perhaps 1-2 hours every week reviewing approval requests after the preliminary rollout.”

– ThreatLocker Overview, Jonathan G. 

CloudSEK is an AI-powered menace intelligence instrument that detects cyber threats, extends safety protection to cloud databases, and screens any suspicious exercise from a centralized platform to enhance information protection mechanisms.

Based mostly on 50+ verified G2, CloudSEK achieved a mean satisfaction rating of 88, with 97% customers prepared to suggest it to others for proactive alerts, deployment, and safety validation. 

The very first thing that caught my eye was the dashboard. It’s extremely intuitive and neatly laid out, making it straightforward to get a complete snapshot of your menace panorama with out drowning in noise.

Every thing from model monitoring to VIP safety and digital threat monitoring is introduced in a approach that simply is smart. I discovered it tremendous helpful to have all these modules tightly built-in; it gave me an entire image of our digital publicity with minimal effort.

What I really like most about CloudSEK is its proactive method. The platform would not simply warn you about current threats; it additionally surfaces rising dangers earlier than they escalate. That is an enormous step if you find yourself attempting to stay one step forward of adversaries.

For example, their menace actor profiling and context-rich incident summaries actually helped me perceive not simply the “what”, but in addition the “who” and “why” behind every alert. Plus, their bulk closure function for incidents is an absolute time saver, particularly if you find yourself coping with recurring or false-positive-prone alerts. 

In accordance with G2 consumer evaluations, CloudSEK is valued for its fast deployment and robust threat monitoring, although false positives are often famous. The detection engine could be a bit aggressive, requiring upfront fine-tuning of alert guidelines to keep away from pointless escalations.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to customization and automation. Creating new guidelines or workflows can really feel extra inflexible in comparison with different platforms, and whereas API integrations exist, documentation isn’t at all times as strong as customers anticipate.

General, G2 sentiment displays CloudSEK as an accessible and scalable platform that delivers complete digital threat monitoring and model safety throughout net, deep net, and darkish net sources.

What I dislike about CloudSEK:

• Though CloudSEK gives real-time menace alerts, the variety of false positives is alarming when the alert rule shouldn’t be tuned correctly.
• I additionally observed the sheer quantity of alerts, which makes it seem as if we’re always drowning in information that principally seems to be irrelevant or false positives.

What do G2 customers dislike about CloudSEK:

“If CloudSEK may streamline its setup course of and supply extra aggressive pricing, I’d be far more inclined to suggest it.”

– CloudSEK Overview, Rajendra D.

In 2025, focus your information safety workflow hub in a single place with one of the best SIEM software program and select a extra centralized approach of monitoring your information remotely.