What Stood Out In My Evaluation

Some years again, I witnessed a magnanimous safety breach of a trademarked firm web site in my earlier firm, which left the IT staff frozen in shock.

Had the menace been detected or analyzed earlier, a correct menace detection and mitigation framework may need prevented the mishap.

It additionally intrigued me to have some talks over tea with my firm’s community engineers and cybersecurity analysts to get intel on the options or advantages they search from a menace intelligence software at this time.

With their insights, I seen the demand for multi-source knowledge aggregation to create and correlate threats, real-time menace detection and monitoring, automation, AI-driven knowledge privateness, and contextual menace intelligence, that are key options in menace intelligence instruments that may stop disastrous outcomes.

With this define, I sought to investigate and consider 7 greatest menace intelligence instruments available in the market at this time to create and co-relate threats, analyze and mitigate safety dangers and cut back the dependency on handbook groups to extract menace histories and causes. Let’s get into it!

7 greatest menace intelligence instruments: my high picks

A menace intelligence software protects and safeguards a corporation towards various safety dangers, akin to cyber assaults, brute power assaults, zero-day assaults, and zero-day vulnerabilities. After I began evaluating menace intelligence instruments, my main focus was on which instruments are fitted with the most recent safety protocols to take care of robust encryption requirements for a corporation’s knowledge and supply real-time menace detection.

Whereas evaluating and researching, I famous key parameters {that a} safety staff searches for, akin to the necessity to accumulate and correlate menace knowledge from various sources, together with open supply intelligence (OSINT), industrial feeds, and inside logs. Consumers additionally search instruments that supply AI-based automation for menace evaluation and contextual menace intelligence to detect techniques, methods, and procedures relating to threats.

My evaluation covers the highest 7 menace intelligence instruments available in the market, which supply strong safety frameworks to fight any threat of unwarranted threats.

What makes a menace intelligence software value it: my opinion 

My evaluation had a singleton conclusion; a software that identifies clever patterns of AI-powered cyberattacks or knowledge breaches and alerts the system about potential threats or safety warnings is a perfect menace intelligence software.

Additional, these techniques combine with SIEM instruments, antivirus instruments and endpoint detection instruments to strengthen the safety posture and determine and mitigate threats sooner.

With a robust deal with safety and privateness, I recognized the next essential options that it’s best to look out for in a menace intelligence software. 

• Automated menace knowledge aggregation and normalization: After I assess any menace intelligence software, the very first thing I guarantee is that it will probably create and correlate menace knowledge from a number of sources like OSINT, inside logs, and industrial feeds. This was an important step in contextualizing menace and standardizing menace patterns for sooner evaluation and real-time detection. With out aggregation and normalization, menace knowledge stays chaotic and nearly unusable. A superb software unifies this data and saves numerous handbook hours of labor for analysts.
• Contextualized menace enrichment: I additionally thought of which instruments contextualized threats along with sending an alert or warning within the system. A robust menace enrichment module is essential to forecasting and mitigating the menace. The platform should layer important metadata, akin to attacker techniques (MITRE ATT&CK), industries focused, and malware households used, so that you just aren’t simply seeing what the menace is but in addition why it issues to them particularly. Instruments that fail to do that depart customers flying blind.
• Actual-time menace detection and alerting: Clever snoopers or attackers create new infiltration patterns each second. Which is why a menace intelligence software needs to be powered with real-time detection and actionable alerting. Whether or not by way of integrations with SIEMs, SOARs, or standalone dashboards, these instruments ought to battle AI-powered attacking mechanisms with tight protection mitigation methods. With real-time menace detection, you’ll be able to transfer and react at machine pace and never with a “next-business-day” nature. 
• Tailor-made intelligence in your trade and threat profile: In my analysis, these instruments are deemed greatest as a result of they allow you to customise menace feeds and intelligence primarily based in your trade, geography, digital footprint, and particular threat urge for food. Customization ensures that the staff will get related, actionable insights and never a truckload of irrelevant alerts with no measurement of threat depth.
• Risk investigation and deep dive analytics module: These instruments wanted to be geared up with a sophisticated analytics dashboard to show menace circumstances, menace sources, and menace mitigation knowledge. They even have investigation workbenches the place you’ll be able to pivot between menace indicators, discover assault paths, enrich IPs and domains, and join dots throughout campaigns. Investigative agility makes the distinction between reactive defence and proactive searching. 
• Collaboration, sharing and reporting capabilities: In a contemporary safety ecosystem, no staff operates alone. That is why I shortlisted instruments which have built-in mechanisms for sharing intelligence with inside or exterior groups, organizations and even ISACs and nationwide cyber alliances to kind a sturdy infrastructure of safety. Equally necessary is automated and customizable reporting in order that safety groups can simply talk threat and impression to management and non-technical stakeholders.

All of it boils right down to how a menace intelligence software creates menace knowledge, contextualizes threats with forecasting, and catches maintain of sensible AI-based breaches to set off menace alerts and protection methods to counter dangers.

Instruments that stood out when it comes to buyer satisfaction, buyer section, and G2 sentiment scoring are the highest menace intelligence software contenders on this record since they’re primarily based on real-time G2 person evaluate knowledge.

Out of a number of menace intelligence instruments that I evaluated, the highest 7 have made it to this record. This record under incorporates real evaluations from the menace intelligence class web page. To be included on this class, a software program should:

• Present data on rising threats and vulnerabilities.
• Element remediation practices for frequent and rising threats.
• Analyze world threats on various kinds of networks and units 
• Cater menace data to particular IT options.

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations might have been edited for readability.  

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native endpoint detection and utility safety platform that retains your safety techniques updated and defends your on-prem or cloud knowledge towards unwarranted assaults or breaches.

What instantly impressed me was how straightforward it was to combine with my present Azure setup. The preliminary deployment was principally easy; no extra configuration is required except you are going deep into hybrid or multi-cloud environments.

It simply clicked with Azure providers, Microsoft 365, and even AWS and GCP, which was a nice shock. In addition they have a pay-as-you-go subscription mannequin that feels versatile in case you are not prepared for an enormous dedication upfront.

One of many first issues that stood out was the safety rating dashboard. It is like a real-time report card in your cloud posture that highlights vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and dangerous assets. I beloved how detailed it was, breaking down particular person assets inside every subscription and giving clear suggestions for fixing points. 

Typically, in case you are fortunate, you’ll be able to even simply click on “Repair” and it auto remediates. That saved me a bunch of time. Plus, the mixing with Azure Energetic Listing made id safety tremendous easy.

The distinction between tiers in premium options was fairly noticeable. The free tier provides you fundamentals like safety assessments, suggestions, and coverage administration. Actually, that is sufficient to get you began.

However as soon as I upgraded to the usual plan, issues received a bit extra highly effective. I received entry to just-in-time VM entry, adaptive utility controls, and community menace detection. The Simply in time entry function is a lifesaver in case you are working with VMs and want to scale back publicity with out manually shutting issues on and off on a regular basis.

Additionally, there’s one other function referred to as Defender for Servers, a premium plan that stunned me with options like file integrity monitoring (it alerts on file adjustments however typically misses the context of potential malicious exercise). It could be even higher if they might proactively flag behaviours as a substitute of simply logging adjustments.

I additionally need to point out their help for menace safety, real-time detection, AI-based menace analytics, anti-malware, and anti-phishing. It is particularly nice at monitoring electronic mail threats, with whitelisting choices that allow you to shield trusted distributors.

Plus, the multi-cloud safety protection is not simply Azure-exclusive; it expands throughout AWS and GCP, providing insights and proposals tailor-made to every cloud.

There are some areas to enhance, nonetheless. Some customers actually struggled with the difficulty of complexity. Organising among the extra superior options, like multi-cloud monitoring or integrations with third-party options like Mimecast, wasn’t precisely plug-and-play, particularly in case you aren’t accustomed to how Microsoft constructions its insurance policies and configurations.

Some customers even discovered third-party connections clunkier. And a few had been aggravated with the speed of false positives.

Defender typically flagged completely benign actions as suspicious, inflicting pointless alerts that my staff needed to waste time investigating. 

Pricing was one other problem. For small companies, particularly, the transfer to extra superior plans might really feel steep, and the truth that sure anticipated options (like deeper electronic mail safety or Workplace integrations) are typically locked behind greater tiers felt a bit irritating. 

So far as efficiency is anxious, it was principally stable, however in environments with unstable web connections, the dependency on cloud typically led to slight lag.  And the help expertise appeared closely tiered. Until you’ve a paid subscription with Microsoft Assist, you aren’t at all times assured top-tier assist.

Additionally, if I’m being trustworthy, the person interface was a bit incomprehensible. Microsoft tends to roll out new options and UI adjustments fairly quickly, so proper while you get used to a format, it is possible that they are going to throw a curveball your method. 

General, Microsoft Defender for Cloud protects your on-premises and cloud knowledge towards the danger of safety breaches and helps you monitor safety postures throughout totally different databases from a centralized platform.

What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

• Though the software offers endpoint safety for all units, the deployment course of may be very advanced when configuring safety for iOS system. 
• One other gripe I discovered was the pricing. It might probably rapidly turn into costly, and the overload of alerts results in false positives. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

“What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the advanced pricing, which may rapidly turn into costly, and the overload of alerts, typically resulting in false positives. Moreover, the mukti-cloud help is not as strong for non-azure platforms, the preliminary setups will be difficult for groups with out cloud safety setup expertise.”

– Microsoft Defender for Cloud Overview, Archi P.

Recorded Future offers an entire breakdown of real-time safety breaches or threats, initiates menace mitigation practices, and protects your safety firewall towards snoops or spies.

What actually hooked me from the start was how quick and clever it feels- like having an analyst staff working 24/7, continually feeding me actionable menace insights. It is not simply knowledge dumped from random sources, Recorded Future curates menace intelligence from a powerful mixture of open net, darkish net, closed boards and technical telemetry, and by some means all of it is sensible.

I can belief the alerts I obtain as a result of they aren’t solely real-time but in addition prioritized primarily based on relevance and impression.

I additionally appreciated the fusion of machine pace assortment with human-curated evaluation. It means I do not simply get the automated noise; I get contextual and enriched intelligence that I can work on.

This mix actually helps our proactive, intelligence-driven safety operations. The integration with SIEMs and SOAR platforms makes life simpler too, as the whole lot plugs in seamlessly with out having to create workarounds.

I additionally recognize the myriad of options, like their super-detailed menace maps, threat scores, and entity profiles. If you’re in an enormous group, the premium options in upper-tier subscriptions supply much more superior modules like assault floor monitoring, model safety, and geopolitical intelligence. 

Some plans additionally include analyst-on-demand providers, which is nice after I want knowledgeable validation for a fast strategic seek the advice of and recommendation. 

Nonetheless, there have been a number of areas that I struggled with, and even G2 reviewers talked about as potential areas of enchancment. The interface, whereas highly effective, felt overwhelming at first. There’s simply a lot knowledge, and except you’re taking the time to tune it and filter what’s related, you’ll drown within the sea of alerts that the system detects.

I’ve undoubtedly needed to lean on our account executives throughout onboarding to make sense of the whole lot. And I ought to point out,  these account executives are severely top-notch. Their help staff is tremendous responsive and proactive. It is simply that typically we depend on them a bit an excessive amount of to get the total worth of the platform.

I really feel just like the pricing will be steep and exorbitant as nicely. Recorded Future is not low cost, and so they have moved from a unified license mannequin to a extra modular pricing construction. The flexibleness is good in concept, nevertheless it additionally implies that extra superior options like fraud detection, vulnerability intelligence, or nation-state actor monitoring are locked behind extra premium plans. For small safety groups or budget-conscious orgs, this is likely to be a bit proscribing.

General, I really feel recorded future helps create and co-relate menace knowledge from inside techniques, present a menace mitigation framework, and analyze real-time menace detection eventualities to raise your safety a notch.

What I dislike about Recorded Future:

• Whereas Recorded Future affords an entire package deal, nevertheless it comes with a price. I seen that the superior tier plans require you to pay a hefty quantity. Additionally, you must pay for every additional API integration, so the licensing mannequin is dear.
• I additionally discovered that whereas the platform is highly effective, it may be difficult for brand new customers to make the most of and work with it with out intensive coaching. The educational curve is steep, significantly for superior options like question builder and integrations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Recorded Future:

“The recorded future has so many various modules that it may be a bit obscure what capabilities my staff does and doesn’t have entry to.”

– Recorded Future Overview, Tyler C.

Cyberint is an end-to-end cyber intelligence platform that enables corporations to detect, analyze, and examine unwarranted actions and cyber threats earlier than they adversely impression the general privateness community.

I’ve been exploring Cyberint’s Argos Risk Intelligence Platform for fairly a while, and I’ve to say that it’s a combined bag. What actually drew me in at first was how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is. It would not bombard you with jargon or overcomplicated workflows, which is strictly what’s necessary when integrating it together with your safety operations.

The software’s safety framework was accomplished by real-time menace detection and assault floor monitoring. Inside days, Argos helped our staff determine and reply to darkish net threats and model impersonations we did not even know existed.

I additionally appreciated their customizable alert system. Every alert comes tagged with the respective menace type- be it fishing, credential leaks, uncovered property, or suspicious mentions on illicit boards.

The platform would not simply throw knowledge at you; it contextualizes it. We significantly benefited from their darkish net intelligence and deep visibility into menace actors’ techniques, methods, and procedures (TTPs). It felt like having a 24/7 menace hunter embedded in our staff.

A function I’ve come to depend on closely is Argo’s third-party threat monitoring, which checks for vulnerabilities throughout our vendor ecosystem. This sort of foresight has saved us a number of instances from potential publicity. The model safety module is top-notch. It actively displays social media, rogue domains, and pretend apps impersonating our enterprise. Actually, it’s one of the vital full suites I’ve seen in a menace intelligence platform.

That mentioned, it’s not with out its faults. For starters, the API can really feel undercooked. I used to be anticipating much more mature and versatile catalog for integration into our broader SOAR pipeline, however I discovered it missing. Some customers, together with me, additionally struggled with the restricted customization of dashboards and reviews. 

It is like when you hit the bounds of the UI, you are caught. There has additionally been suggestions round copying/pasting visible knowledge like menace graphs or picture proof, which is not seamless and provides friction when collaborating throughout groups.

One other challenge we bumped into was round false positives. Whereas uncommon, after they do occur, the filtering and suggestions mechanism isn’t as easy as I’d like. I additionally discovered that some options appeared half-baked or unnecessarily gated, presumably relying on the pricing tier, although that half isn’t at all times clearly communicated.

Talking of pricing, Cyberint affords a number of plan tiers. Whereas they don’t publish them publicly, primarily based on my analysis and others’ experiences, the core differentiators typically revolve across the depth of exterior assault floor protection, the amount of monitored property, and the SLA-driven menace response timeframes.

Their premium plans embrace devoted analysts, superior API entry, and customized model monitoring rulesets. In case your org is mid-to-large scale and actively focused, I’d undoubtedly suggest going for the upper tier.

General, Cyberint affords end-to-end menace safety, deep monitoring, and safety towards exterior vulnerabilities inside its software program stack to safeguard your property towards threats.

What I dislike about Cyberint:

• Whereas Cyberint offers end-to-end alerts about lively assaults, you must manually replace the standing of alerts, even in case you have achieved so by way of a SIEM system.
• I additionally seen some minor UI bugs, like alerts not opening in a brand new web page when urgent Ctrl+click on. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Cyberint:

There are options within the answer that appear to have redundant performance, however nonetheless, such performance continues to be helpful to a corporation.

One other factor is that the extra options is usually a bit regarding when it comes to the group’s funds. However, if such a burden will be dealt with, I absolutely help having this answer in case you are on the lookout for a cyber menace intelligence answer

– Cyberint Overview, Gen Hart B.

Crowdstrike Endpoint Safety Platform offers anti-ransomware options to take care of safety benchmark throughout all of your community units and tech stack. It covers incidents, vulnerabilities, assaults, and malware detection beneath its belt.

What instantly stood out to me was how light-weight it’s. It doesn’t bathroom down system efficiency like some older-gen antivirus instruments do. The setup was refreshingly straightforward, too. I used to be capable of deploy it throughout endpoints with minimal friction, and the unified agent structure meant I didn’t need to juggle a number of installs for various modules.

Certainly one of its superpowers is real-time menace detection. CrowdStrike’s cloud-native structure leverages behavioral analytics and AI-based menace intelligence to proactively detect anomalies like ransomware, fileless malware, zero-day assaults, and extra.

I used to be additionally impressed with how briskly it reacts. The Falcon Stop module (included even within the base plan) already outperforms many conventional AVs, however as quickly as I added Falcon Perception for EDR, I actually noticed the ability of real-time telemetry and investigation. The extent of element it offers is like having a magnifying glass into your community exercise.

What I additionally recognize is the single-agent strategy. I didn’t need to overload machines with totally different endpoint instruments. Whether or not it was vulnerability administration by Falcon Highlight, menace searching by way of Falcon OverWatch, or system management, the whole lot built-in seamlessly.

In case you go for higher-tier plans like Falcon Enterprise or Falcon Full, you additionally get 24/7 managed menace searching, which, let’s be trustworthy, is a sport changer when your staff is small or overworked. These guys virtually turn into your SOC extension.

However there are some drawbacks to the software. One factor that I need to level out is the fee, as a result of it is not essentially the most reasonably priced platform on the market. If you’re in a small enterprise or simply beginning out, the module pricing may really feel a bit an excessive amount of.

One other space the place it lacked a bit was buyer help. Whereas I had stable interactions with help staff, however there have been instances that ticket resolutions received a bit extra dragged.

I additionally need to point out the incidence of “false positives.” They’re uncommon, however after they do pop up, it may be a bit tough to research and suppress except you might be tremendous accustomed to the console.

Talking of it, the Falcon Console is highly effective, however not precisely intuitive for first-timers. It took me a little bit of poking round to know all dashboards and settings.
And whereas the platform excels in detection, I really feel the remediation capabilities can enhance.

General, Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection offers full protection towards unwarranted threats or assaults and helps you mitigate deadly threats or breakouts.

What I dislike about Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Safety Platform:

• Though it does an ideal job of offering alerts and updates, we can not go into a lot element after we choose the sensor from the system tray.
• I additionally seen that there are lots of screens to handle, it’s onerous to succeed in each function, and there’s a want to know computer systems at a excessive stage.

What do G2 customers dislike about Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform:

“For some newer apps, the extent of integration is not as pleasant and easy appropriately. Additionally, Linux help will be improved.”

– Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform Overview, Atanu M.

Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety offers AI-powered knowledge safety towards email-borne and harmful assaults. It leverages machine studying and social graphing to detect threats in real-time.

Mimecast is among the instruments that runs quietly within the background, shielding our group from phishing, malware, spoofing, and impersonation makes an attempt. It hardly ever lets something malicious slip by.

The AI-driven safety is legit, I’ve seen it catch some extremely refined impersonation makes an attempt, particularly these tough CEO fraud-style emails that used to fly beneath the radar.

Certainly one of my favourite options is its real-time hyperlink and attachment scanning. When an electronic mail hits your inbox, Mimecast doesn’t simply let it cross by. It actively scans the whole lot embedded within the message. Plus, the e-mail continuity function additionally proves helpful. Throughout service outages, Mimecast retains our electronic mail visitors flowing in order that communication would not cease.

I additionally appreciated the admin dashboard, which is stacked with capabilities. Initially, it felt a bit overwhelming, however sort of thrilling. When you get previous the preliminary curve, although, it turns into a robust management heart.

You possibly can configure insurance policies right down to the smallest element, set granular filtering guidelines, and simply entry logs and menace reviews. I particularly recognize the e-mail archiving and e-discovery instruments. They’re clear, searchable, and make regulatory compliance easy.

However the platform does have its share of limitations. False positives is usually a little bit of ache. Mimecast is typically too aggressive, flagging official messages as suspicious.

The false positives is usually a little bit of a ache. Mimecast is typically too aggressive, flagging official messages as suspicious, which implies I’ve to step in and manually launch or whitelist sure emails. That would not be such a trouble if the interface for whitelisting weren’t a bit clunky.

Additionally, configuring superior insurance policies can typically require a great deal of trial and error, and some of my colleagues have grumbled about SAML login errors that have an effect on admin entry intermittently.

So far as pricing is anxious, Mimecast is not low cost. It undoubtedly contains extra premium plans. Relying in your subscription tier, you get various ranges of help and have depth. I explored a lower-tier help plan, however even then, the response instances have been stable. That mentioned, some customers talked about that they’d like sooner decision, particularly for pressing safety occasions.

What I discover significantly useful is how scalable Mimecast is. Its cloud-based deployment makes it tremendous straightforward to develop together with your group, whether or not you might be including customers or extending insurance policies to new areas.

For bigger organizations, coping with heavy electronic mail volumes and complicated menace vectors, it’s essential that the software affords flexibility because the enterprise scales and grows its infrastructure.

General, Mimecast affords tight-knit electronic mail safety protection and encryption to safe important knowledge exchanges and alerts the system on the incidence of any infiltration.

What I dislike about Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety

• Though Mimecast detects any presence of phishing makes an attempt or malware in emails, it may be a bit aggressive with filtering, resulting in false positives that require handbook evaluate.
• One other factor I seen is that Mimecast flags official emails as suspicious at instances, resulting in delays in communication.

What do G2 customers dislike about Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety:

The draw back is that the help is a bit off-putting in case you are previous your implementation part. Among the guidelines and insurance policies are onerous to configure by implementation.

– Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety Overview, Jessica C.

Threatlocker is a good software for detecting and capturing undesirable exercise throughout your safety community. It offers a suite of cybersecurity instruments to scale your knowledge and content material safety workflows and cut back the danger of information breaches or vulnerabilities.

I’ve explored a number of safety instruments earlier than, however Threatlocker stands out, principally as a result of it does what it guarantees. From the start, it was clear that this wasn’t a primary antivirus or general-purpose software. It is constructed particularly to implement zero belief on the utility stage.

The core function, utility whitelisting, implies that solely software program we’ve explicitly accredited can run. It provides us speedy visibility into unauthorized applications and, in lots of circumstances, stops potential threats earlier than they even begin.

One other function I take advantage of closely is Ringfencing. It’s not nearly what apps can run but in addition about what they’re allowed to work together with. For instance, I can cease a trusted utility like Microsoft Phrase from launching PowerShell or accessing delicate knowledge directories. This stage of segmentation has helped us stop lateral motion and prohibit how even accredited instruments can behave.

ThreatLocker’s help staff has been one of the vital dependable facets of the expertise. Any time we hit a configuration challenge or wanted steering, they had been fast to reply and useful all through. That stage of help made an actual distinction, particularly within the early days after we had been nonetheless determining how one can construction insurance policies successfully.

That mentioned, the training curve was vital. It took time to know how totally different insurance policies work together and how one can construction guidelines with out over-blocking or permitting an excessive amount of. It’s not one thing you arrange in an hour and neglect about—it requires an actual dedication to managing insurance policies and staying on high of recent alerts.

There have been additionally moments the place the platform’s quick tempo of growth made issues difficult. Options had been up to date or added regularly, and whereas that reveals the product is actively enhancing, it additionally implies that documentation typically lagged behind. At instances, it felt like we needed to relearn elements of the platform extra typically than we’d like.

Other than this, the software additionally contains different helpful options like storage management to dam unauthorized USB entry, which has prevented the danger of information leaks. The elevation management module permits us to tightly handle which customers can run software program with elevated privileges, thereby making privilege escalation extra auditable.

We additionally depend on centralized logging and audit trails to evaluate any violations or exceptions, which is essential for compliance and inside evaluations.

General, Threatlocker lets you fastidiously monitor your safety workflows and be certain that your knowledge is dealt with accurately by licensed customers throughout the group to remove any sudden menace likelihood.

What I dislike about Threatlocker:

• Whereas Threatlocker empowers you to enhance your zero belief strategy and privileges, it takes a while to fine-tune insurance policies, particularly to start with, and managing approvals is usually a little bit of a studying curve.
• Whereas Threatlocker is a sturdy safety software, the general studying curve can be steep for customers who are usually not accustomed to its interface and complicated configurations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Threatlocker:

“It is not a draw back, however ThreatLocker requires time & assets to totally perceive the product and supply wonderful help to your prospects. It is not a click on and deploy and by no means take a look at it once more product. That mentioned, we spend perhaps 1-2 hours every week reviewing approval requests after the preliminary rollout.”

– Threatlocker Overview, Jonathan G. 

CloudSEK is an AI-powered menace intelligence software that detects cyber-threats, extends safety protection to cloud databases, and displays any suspicious exercise from a centralized platform to enhance knowledge protection mechanisms.

The very first thing that caught my eye was the dashboard. It’s extremely intuitive and neatly laid out, making it straightforward to get a complete snapshot of your menace panorama with out drowning in noise.

Every thing from model monitoring to VIP safety and digital threat monitoring is introduced in a method that simply is sensible. I discovered it tremendous helpful to have all these modules tightly built-in; it gave me an entire image of our digital publicity with minimal effort.

What I really like most about CloudSEK is its proactive strategy. The platform would not simply provide you with a warning about present threats, it additionally surfaces rising dangers earlier than they escalate. That is an enormous step if you end up making an attempt to stay one step forward of adversaries.

For example, their menace actor profiling and context-rich incident summaries actually helped me perceive not simply the “what”, but in addition the “who” and “why” behind every alert. Plus, their bulk closure function for incidents is an absolute time saver, particularly if you end up coping with recurring or false-positive inclined alerts. 

Nonetheless, talking of false positives, there are a number of areas the place the software would not fairly dwell up. Whereas the detection engine is highly effective, it will probably typically be a bit too enthusiastic, flagging incidents that didn’t require escalation. It is not a call driver, nevertheless it does imply you must make investments a while upfront in fine-tuning your alert guidelines.

Additionally, creating new guidelines or use-cases isn’t as easy as I’d like. It might probably really feel a bit inflexible in comparison with different platforms that supply extra customization choices out of the field.

Digging into the premium options, CloudSEK affords tiered subscription plans that scale nicely relying on the maturity of your safety program. On the core, you get digital threat monitoring, floor net and deep/darkish net surveillance, and built-in model and area safety.

What stood out to me was the simplicity of deploying the platform. Not like some bloated safety instruments that require weeks {of professional} providers to rise up and working, CloudSEK was comparatively plug-and-play. That mentioned, I did hit a number of bumps when making an attempt to automate sure workflows. 

It does supply API integration, however the documentation is not strong for extra commonplace processes. 

General,  CloudSEK offers safe authentication frameworks to guard your digital privateness and set safety benchmarks to investigate, mitigate, and overcome real-time alerts and dangers.

What I dislike about CloudSEK:

• Though CloudSEK affords real-time menace alerts, the variety of false positives is alarming when the alert rule just isn’t tuned correctly.
• I additionally seen the sheer quantity of alerts, which makes it seem as if we’re continually drowning in knowledge that principally seems to be irrelevant or false positives.

What do G2 customers dislike about CloudSEK:

“If CloudSEK might streamline its setup course of and supply extra aggressive pricing, I’d be far more inclined to suggest it.”

– CloudSEK Overview, Rajendra D.

In 2025, focus your knowledge safety workflow hub in a single place with the most effective SIEM software program and select a extra centralized method of monitoring your knowledge remotely.