Thursday, January 1, 2026

The Grand Finale Proves How Important The Franchise’s Finest Character Was





This text comprises spoilers for “Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale.”

If it looks like we have been saying goodbye to “Downton Abbey” for a very long time now, that is as a result of now we have. The ITV interval melodrama initially led to 2015 with the sixth sequence’ Christmas particular. Nearly each character acquired as better of a ship off as they may presumably get. However with the present exploding into a worldwide phenomenon, it was inevitable that it will return in some type or one other. The results of this was a trilogy of theatrically-released function movies that teased the incoming practice of progress, whereas not straying too removed from the established order. With the Crawley household nonetheless residing of their early twentieth century luxurious, there was loads of room for extra tales to be informed. “Downton Abbey” could have been a closely romanticized depiction of an aristocratic household and their downstairs workers, however audiences missed its fantastical class dynamics as a result of they actually got here to love spending time with this ensemble.

In my assessment for “Downton Abbey: A New Period,” I praised the movie as a vibrant and emotional sequel that caused the most effective of its charming characters. A lot of the Crawley clan bought to go on trip to the south of France, whereas Woman Mary (Michelle Dockery) stayed behind to assist remodel a silent image right into a talkie. It was like an enormous hangout film that is concurrently hit with a wave of melancholy and optimism for the long run. Fan favourite characters like Mr. Molesley (Kevin Doyle) even ended up discovering his area of interest in writing screenplays. There’s additionally the matter of Robert James-Collier’s Thomas Barrow, who finally ends up with a contented ending that permits him to embrace his queer id with suave film star Man Dexter (Dominic West). Getting to speak with stars like Jim Carter and Raquel Cassidy for that movie’s press tour a couple of years again highlighted how a lot these actors have comfortably settled into their roles over the previous decade or so.

Arguably the best energy of “Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale” lies in seeing these beloved characters brace themselves for a courageous new future, even when the movie is extremely lackluster in constructing upon that sentiment. However there is a noticeable absence among the many ensemble in Dame Maggie Smith’s Violet Crawley, in any other case known as the Dowager Countess. The place her fictional counterpart died a peaceable loss of life within the ending of “A New Period,” Smith sadly handed away a couple of months after the movie’s launch. The third movie, which is memorialized in her honor, places the Crawleys able the place they do not have their beloved matriarch there to supply her enter. Sadly, “The Grand Finale” feels empty with out Smith’s presence.

Downton Abbey is not the identical with out Dame Maggie Smith’s Dowager Countess

Smith could not have thought-about her tenure with “Downton Abbey” as one of many pinnacles of her lengthy and illustrious profession, however she was undoubtedly one of many franchise’s greatest characters. Violet, by all counts, would not carry the cynical and pricklier fringe of her counterpart in “Gosford Park,” in any other case generally known as the stepping stone for “Downton Abbey.” With creator Julian Fellowes opting to desert the meaner streak of his Academy Award-winning screenplay and lean into what would turn into this sequence’ nostalgic hue, this character was disadvantaged of her disagreeable nature. As an alternative, the Dowager turned the Crawley household matriarch, whose easy dry wit led to a number of the greatest insults on tv.

In “Downton Abbey,” Violet’s resistance to vary was typically introduced as endearing. She might oftentimes be seen as essentially the most level-headed particular person within the room, having lived by a lot historical past. By her friendship with Cousin Isobel (Penelope Wilton), Violet would present indicators of progress in her angle towards progress. Nobody is extra shocked by her change in spirits and opinions than her. Violet will typically have a smile on her face about it too as a result of she loves her household approach an excessive amount of to let her stubbornness of traditions get in the way in which. Having Violet absent in “The Grand Finale” leaves Woman Mary able to run issues on her personal, however the movie sadly suffers because of this.

I really feel I ought to make a remark that it is not the fault of “Downton Abbey” that Smith’s real-life passing prevents her from making an look right here. In actual fact, when the ultimate scene began exhibiting recollections of the previous, I used to be deeply involved they had been going to drag a “Cobra Kai” and use an AI deepfake to carry her again to life for one final tearjerker with Woman Mary. Fortunately, this does not occur; her inclusion is made up of repurposed footage from earlier seasons of the present.

The issue lies in how the ensemble feels prefer it’s dramatically drifting within the wind with out her character. The Crawleys being pressured to reckon with their stature on the earth with out her is a superb idea that would have led to emotional revelations and exhausting truths in regards to the dwindling tolerance for the aristocratic life-style, however “The Grand Finale” is allergic to any significant change. “A New Period” most likely ought to have been the top of it in hindsight, given how this new movie would not provide any extra of a radical conclusion with out her. Nonetheless, although “The Grand Finale” comes throughout as an undercooked curtain name, it ensures Smith’s legacy will little question reside on.

“Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale” is now enjoying in theaters nationwide.



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles