My Tackle the 7 Greatest Enterprise Course of Administration Software program

Each rising enterprise hits a degree the place spreadsheets, scattered emails, and handbook workflows simply don’t minimize it anymore. Issues begin slipping via the cracks. Groups spend extra time determining how to work than really getting work finished. That’s if you notice: it’s not nearly arduous work—it’s about smarter processes.

That sparked my deep dive into the finest enterprise course of administration (BPM) software program. I wished to learn the way right now’s prime firms are scaling operations, staying agile, and decreasing waste—all with out dropping management.

I frolicked reviewing top-rated platforms, digging into consumer suggestions on G2, and testing options hands-on. What stood out was how a lot BPM instruments have advanced—they now provide low-code automation, real-time analytics, and seamless integrations that really change workflows.

In case your workforce is able to streamline operations, break silos, and construct processes that truly assist your progress, maintain studying. I’ve rounded up the perfect enterprise course of administration software program that will help you get there.

My prime 7 enterprise course of administration software program suggestions for 2025

One of the best enterprise course of administration software program is designed to assist organizations streamline operations, enhance effectivity, and guarantee constant workflows. As I evaluated these instruments, I noticed how they simplify course of automation, improve collaboration throughout groups, and supply useful insights for steady enchancment, all whereas guaranteeing compliance and transparency in each step of the method.

What makes enterprise course of administration software program value it: my opinion

This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions have been edited for readability.

After reviewing a variety of G2 consumer suggestions on Microsoft Energy Automate, what stands out to me instantly is how steadily customers point out its beginner-friendly interface.

I’ve seen many reviewers spotlight how straightforward it’s to make use of, even with none coding expertise. A constant theme within the opinions is that customers really feel like they’re assembling digital constructing blocks. From what I’ve learn, this drag-and-drop method makes automation really feel accessible and fast to study, particularly for these with no technical background.

I steadily see G2 customers praise Energy Automate’s flexibility with integrations. Based on suggestions I gathered, this flexibility is not restricted to only Microsoft apps—reviewers point out profitable integrations with platforms like Google Workspace, Slack, Twitter, and Salesforce. This breadth of compatibility is a giant deal for customers working in hybrid environments with a number of instruments of their tech stack.

One standout functionality, in keeping with customers, is the provision of automation templates. I’ve learn a number of opinions the place customers say the pre-built templates saved them important time when automating processes like onboarding or expense reporting. A generally appreciated factor is how these templates could be personalized—customers like that they will tweak them for complicated workflows with out feeling overwhelmed. From what I’ve seen, this steadiness between simplicity and energy is a significant draw.

That mentioned, price is an space the place I’ve observed recurring issues. Subscription pricing typically comes up as a degree of friction, particularly for groups seeking to scale automation throughout departments. G2 customers steadily be aware that whereas the instrument delivers worth, the rising prices can result in cautious prioritization about which workflows really need automation.

I’ve additionally seen some customers categorical frustration with efficiency lag throughout complicated or data-heavy runs. Whereas this doesn’t seem like a common difficulty, opinions clearly present that delays can have an effect on time-sensitive duties. A number of reviewers point out needing to construct with efficiency limitations in thoughts.

One other space the place I’ve come throughout noticeable dissatisfaction is workflow debugging. Based on G2 customers, when a move fails, it may be difficult to pinpoint the precise difficulty. The run historical past and logs are useful, however reviewers typically say they really feel like they’re “taking part in detective” resulting from obscure error messages or unclear steps within the course of. It’s a typical ache level that appears to check customers’ endurance, particularly when fast fixes are wanted.

What I dislike about Microsoft Energy Automate:

• I’ve observed customers elevating issues about subscription prices, particularly when making an attempt to scale automation throughout a number of groups.
• I’ve come throughout recurring suggestions the place customers discover it irritating to debug failed flows resulting from obscure error messages.

What G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Energy Automate:

“The desktop move runner sometimes feels sluggish or crashes if the UI modifications even barely within the goal utility. Debugging points can generally be time-consuming, particularly when error messages are obscure. Moreover, the licensing mannequin for RPA options could be complicated and costly for small groups or occasional customers.”

– Microsoft Energy Automate Assessment, Tulika Ok.

Laserfiche stands out as a extremely adaptable platform that customers steadily describe as a highly effective answer for course of automation. I’ve seen a number of reviewers examine it to a “Swiss Military knife” for digital transformation. Whether or not it’s a easy type or a multi-step workflow that features desk storage and customised PDFs, customers say the platform is flexible sufficient to deal with each with ease. There’s a recurring sentiment that “should you can consider it, Laserfiche can automate it.”

A generally appreciated factor in consumer suggestions is Laserfiche’s inside automation capabilities. I steadily see G2 customers point out how the platform goes past public-facing kinds and provides strong backend performance. Reviewers describe workflows that auto-classify paperwork, route approvals, and replace metadata—all with out handbook enter. Based mostly on the suggestions I’ve reviewed, this backend automation seems to considerably scale back administrative burden and improve consistency.

One other standout functionality, in keeping with customers, is Laserfiche’s impression on operational effectivity. A number of reviewers from public sector organizations spotlight the way it has saved a whole bunch of hours by changing handbook duties with automated workflows. There’s a powerful consensus that it doesn’t simply digitize kinds—it helps remodel the complete info administration infrastructure.

Nevertheless, taking a look at broader evaluation tendencies, I’ve seen customers categorical some frustration with customization limitations in kinds, particularly round e mail notifications and activity reassignment. Whereas the platform handles complicated logic and workflow design properly, G2 customers typically point out they’re compelled to make use of workarounds when making an attempt to customise communication templates or reassign duties dynamically. This limitation appears shocking given the general flexibility of the platform.

I’ve additionally come throughout noticeable dissatisfaction round type discipline validation. A number of reviewers point out persistent points the place required fields on public-facing kinds fail to validate correctly. Even when fields are marked as necessary, submissions sometimes come via with key information lacking. This has led to further handbook work and, in some circumstances, diminished the effectivity good points customers had hoped to realize.

Lastly, one recurring grievance I’ve observed is about intermittent system slowness. Some G2 customers report efficiency drops that don’t comply with a transparent sample, which impacts productiveness, notably throughout peak utilization instances. These slowdowns appear to trigger frustration throughout departments and might undercut the advantages of an in any other case environment friendly platform.

What I dislike about Laserfiche:

• I’ve observed customers point out points customizing kinds, particularly round e mail alerts and dynamic activity reassignment, which forces them into workarounds.
• I’ve come throughout a number of opinions the place type discipline validation fails, inflicting lacking information in submissions and additional handbook cleanup.

What G2 customers dislike about Laserfiche:

“I want there have been a setting to inform workroom members when a brand new occasion or board guide is created. It will even be useful to have a greater strategy to create collaborative paperwork within the library. I’m seeking to make a spreadsheet or working doc obtainable for members to edit, however most of my board members don’t have Microsoft accounts, which makes it tough.”

– Laserfiche Assessment, Verified Person in Transportation

Bizagi is steadily praised for its flexibility and customization capabilities. Customers typically spotlight its excessive degree of customization, particularly via JavaScript code and plugins, as one of many platform’s most useful options.

G2 reviewers constantly point out how this enables organizations to tailor the platform to their particular workflows, offering a degree of adaptability that doesn’t really feel inflexible or limiting. Many customers admire this flexibility, because it allows them to create bespoke options that meet their distinctive enterprise wants.

I’ve additionally seen G2 reviewers steadily name out the assist for reusable kinds and guidelines, which is one other function that appears to be a significant benefit. Based on suggestions from customers, the power to construct as soon as and apply throughout a number of workflows has considerably improved effectivity, saving effort and time throughout growth. This functionality is usually praised for sustaining consistency and decreasing redundancy in course of modeling, serving to groups scale their automations with out reinventing the wheel every time.

One other function that G2 customers typically admire is the provision of pre-built elements for system integration. Many reviewers point out how these connectors have simplified the combination course of, enabling them to hyperlink Bizagi with different inside instruments without having to custom-code each integration. This has constantly been seen as a time-saver, with a number of customers noting that it considerably diminished implementation time and complexity throughout onboarding.

Nevertheless, from what I’ve seen in G2 opinions, managing totally different variations of Bizagi has been a typical ache level for a lot of customers. I’ve come throughout suggestions from a number of reviewers who point out dealing with incompatibility points between numerous editions, which frequently led to difficulties when deploying new developments. Some customers expressed frustration with how difficult it could possibly be to use modifications or roll out updates, particularly when coping with the versioning system.

Moreover, I’ve observed that accessing the net model of Bizagi could be inconsistent, which has created confusion and delayed adoption. G2 reviewers have talked about that the net model’s accessibility is determined by the model being utilized by totally different groups or departments, which frequently results in challenges in onboarding new customers throughout enterprise models. This inconsistency seems to be a recurring difficulty that impacts easy adoption in bigger organizations.

Lastly, the dearth of assist for Mac working methods is one other space the place I’ve seen customers categorical noticeable dissatisfaction. Many reviewers point out that in organizations with a major variety of Mac customers, this limitation created a barrier to utilizing the platform. To work round this, some groups needed to arrange digital machines for Mac customers to entry Bizagi, which added pointless complexity and diminished the general consumer expertise. This appears to be a major disadvantage for companies with a various tech atmosphere.

What I dislike about Bizagi:

• I’ve come throughout suggestions the place customers wrestle with versioning points, typically dealing with incompatibility between totally different Bizagi editions.
• I’ve seen a number of customers categorical dissatisfaction with the dearth of Mac OS assist, creating obstacles for groups with a major variety of Mac customers.

What G2 customers dislike about Bizagi:

“Whereas configuring SLA alerts, we encountered difficulties in establishing {custom} notifications. Nevertheless, their buyer assist was environment friendly and offered a quick walkthrough that resolved the difficulty inside a day.”

– Bizagi Assessment, Felix M.

I’ve seen quite a bit of reward for Jotform Workflows’ ease of use. Many customers, like myself, have commented on how simple it’s to arrange workflows. The drag-and-drop interface is steadily highlighted as a significant strength, permitting even non-tech-savvy customers to create automations rapidly and simply. 

One other function that G2 customers typically name out is the platform’s big selection of integrations. Based mostly on the suggestions I’ve reviewed, customers actually worth how simply Jotform connects with numerous apps and instruments, which helps streamline their processes. Integrating with CRMs, e mail advertising and marketing platforms, and file storage methods is a typical theme in opinions, with many customers mentioning how these seamless connections save them plenty of time by automating information move between platforms.

One function that I’ve observed customers steadily spotlight in opinions is the real-time updates offered by Jotform Workflows. Many G2 reviewers point out how useful it’s to see stay standing updates on activity completion. This function makes it simpler to handle workflows and monitor progress, particularly when collaborating with groups or dealing with complicated duties. It appears that evidently this performance is especially appreciated for its skill to maintain everybody on the identical web page, making the administration course of smoother.

Nevertheless, there are additionally areas the place I’ve seen customers categorical frustration. Detrimental suggestions tends to give attention to the restrictions of the free plan, notably the restricted variety of submissions. I’ve come throughout a number of opinions the place customers share their disappointment that testing kinds rely in direction of submission limits. This typically results in rapidly depleting the free submission quota, making it tough to totally take a look at every thing earlier than deployment. Many customers, myself included, discover this limitation irritating.

Moreover, I’ve observed that the shortcoming to extend submission limits on the free plan is one other widespread gripe amongst G2 customers. Whereas upgrading to a paid plan is an possibility, a number of customers have talked about that this could really feel restrictive, notably for these with occasional or much less demanding wants. I’ve learn that customers would admire the power to earn or buy further submissions with out committing to a full paid tier, which might present extra flexibility for these with lighter necessities.

What I dislike about Jotform Workflows:

• I’ve come throughout a number of opinions the place customers categorical frustration with the restrictions of the free plan, particularly the restricted variety of submissions that may make thorough testing tough.
• I’ve observed a number of G2 reviewers point out their disappointment with the shortcoming to extend submission limits on the free plan, feeling that upgrading to a paid plan is a restrictive possibility for these with lighter wants.

What G2 customers dislike about Jotform Workflows:

“At instances, it could actually really feel a bit restricted when coping with very complicated or extremely personalized processes. Some customers would possibly discover sure superior options or deeper automation choices lacking or not as versatile as they’d like. Moreover, whereas the interface is mostly user-friendly, navigating a few of the extra detailed settings or troubleshooting points can generally be just a little complicated or time-consuming. Total, it’s a strong instrument, however it won’t cowl all of the wants for very intricate workflows.”

– Jotform Workflows Assessment, Verified Person in Occasions

I’ve observed that Appian is very regarded for its skill to streamline the idea-to-solution course of.

One function that G2 customers steadily spotlight is Appian’s low-code setup, which permits customers to simply create interfaces, obtain suggestions from stakeholders, and rapidly iterate on designs.  Many reviewers categorical appreciation for the way this setup accelerates growth, guaranteeing that functions are intently aligned with enterprise wants. Based on the suggestions I gathered, this pace and effectivity are main promoting factors for customers in numerous roles, permitting them to maneuver from idea to supply quicker than ever earlier than.

One other side that stands out to me in G2 reviews is Appian’s integration of AI instruments. From what I’ve seen, many customers are impressed by how Appian has included AI into its platform, notably for automating duties and offering predictive insights. G2 reviewers typically point out how these AI capabilities improve the general worth of the platform, positioning it as not simply maintaining with business tendencies however forward of the curve. This forward-thinking method appears to be a key motive why many customers select Appian over different platforms.

One thing else I steadily see praised in G2 opinions is Composer, which permits non-technical workforce members to actively contribute to growth. A number of customers be aware how this function has considerably sped up the event course of, enabling higher collaboration between technical and non-technical groups. The power for enterprise customers to be extra concerned in app creation has fostered higher alignment and improved the top product, which is a constant theme within the suggestions I’ve reviewed.

Nevertheless, I’ve additionally come throughout some limitations that G2 customers point out. One widespread difficulty appears to be the lack of a debugger within the object supervisor. Detrimental suggestions typically facilities round this lacking instrument, with reviewers expressing frustration that troubleshooting turns into harder with out an built-in debugging function. Many customers must depend on workarounds, which may decelerate the event course of, a problem that’s steadily identified in G2 opinions.

One other space of concern I’ve seen in opinions is the restricted UI customization choices. G2 customers have talked about that whereas the UI kinds are useful, there aren’t sufficient customization choices to totally match branding or design necessities. This appears to be a recurring frustration, as some customers discover it arduous to satisfy sure visible requirements resulting from these limitations.

Lastly, the small enter fields for expression rule parameters are one other minor dissatisfaction talked about in G2 opinions. I’ve learn a number of customers categorical frustration with the cramped enter containers, which make it tough to view lengthy strings of code or textual content. Many reviewers really feel that bigger, extra spacious fields would make the event course of smoother and extra user-friendly.

What I dislike about Appian:

• A standard ache level talked about by G2 customers is the absence of a debugger within the object supervisor. This makes troubleshooting harder and results in reliance on workarounds that decelerate growth.
• One other frustration I’ve seen revolves across the restricted UI customization choices. Customers discover it difficult to totally align the interface with their branding or design requirements resulting from inadequate flexibility in customization.

What G2 customers dislike about Appian:

“Though low-code growth is one thing Appian promotes and encourages, nearly each developer finally ends up relying solely on the expression editor, which implies there’s nonetheless a major want for writing code. Nevertheless, Appian does not present as a lot assist for this, notably relating to the consumer interface for the expression editor.”

– Appian Assessment, Verified Person in Non-Revenue Group Administration

I’ve discovered that ARIS is steadily praised as a strong and easy-to-use instrument for enterprise course of administration.

One function that G2 customers constantly spotlight is its skill to doc enterprise processes utilizing BPMN 2.0 notations, which is a extensively accepted normal. From what I’ve seen within the opinions, many customers admire how this performance helps guarantee readability and consistency in course of documentation, making it a useful instrument for each course of consultants and people new to the sector.

One other side that comes up typically in G2 opinions is the intuitive folder construction and performance allocation diagrams. G2 reviewers steadily point out how straightforward it’s to create and set up these diagrams, which helps keep a logical construction when engaged on complicated processes. The consumer interface can also be usually famous as being customer-centric and easy to navigate, which makes it accessible to a broad vary of customers. This ease of use is a recurring theme in suggestions and is usually highlighted as a significant energy of the instrument.

G2 customers additionally appear to essentially admire ARIS’ seamless integration with different software program. From what I’ve gathered, many customers discover that connecting ARIS with different instruments is a easy expertise, which reduces the complexity of managing a number of methods. A standard theme within the opinions is that this integration function helps streamline workflows and eliminates lots of the complications usually related to system compatibility.

One thing I steadily see G2 customers spotlight is the provision of studying assets, together with free certifications at numerous ranges. Many reviewers be aware how these assets assist them deepen their understanding of the instrument, whether or not they’re novices or superior customers. I’ve additionally observed plenty of reward for the course of mining capabilities of ARIS. Customers point out that this function supplies useful insights into enterprise operations, serving to them uncover inefficiencies and areas for enchancment, which appears to be a significant promoting level for course of optimization.

Nevertheless, whereas ARIS has many optimistic attributes, I’ve encountered noticeable dissatisfaction round its excessive acquisition and ongoing servicing prices. Detrimental suggestions typically focuses on how the extra superior capabilities include a steep price ticket, which could be tough to justify for companies making an attempt to steadiness their budgets. Some G2 reviewers categorical frustration about diverting assets away from different important tasks because of the monetary dedication ARIS requires.

Moreover, compatibility points attributable to frequent updates are one other widespread grievance I’ve seen in opinions. Whereas updates usually enhance the software program, some customers level out that they will trigger system breakdowns or new points that want troubleshooting. This disruption to workflows could be irritating, and a number of reviewers point out that it provides operational prices, which is one thing to contemplate when evaluating ARIS for long-term use.

What I dislike about ARIS:

• I’ve come throughout noticeable dissatisfaction across the messaging system in Boardable. A number of customers discover it primary and ineffective, which leads some to revert to e mail for necessary updates.
• From my commentary, adverse suggestions typically focuses on frustrations with the interface and navigation. Customers point out that it may be clunky, making it tough to find previous assembly notes or older paperwork effectively.

What G2 customers dislike about ARIS:

“Creating {custom} features and stories in ARIS is usually difficult. Its integration with ARCM will also be problematic, steadily requiring upkeep after every service launch.”

– ARIS Assessment, Verified Person in Banking

What I dislike about Kissflow:

• I’ve observed recurring suggestions about inconsistent permissions throughout gadgets developed by totally different groups, which may trigger confusion and extra effort to handle entry.
• I’ve come throughout issues relating to the platform’s privateness options, with many customers, together with myself, declaring that information inside processes is shared by default, requiring handbook changes to make sure privateness

What G2 customers dislike about Kissflow:

“Though Kissflow does assist customization, it typically feels fairly restricted. For instance, in certainly one of our use circumstances, we wished to make use of sequence numbers or request numbers in a desk, however Kissflow was unable to accommodate that. The reporting options is also enhanced.”

– Kissflow Assessment, Verified Person in Info Know-how

The BPM panorama is huge and constantly evolving. Listed below are some extra instruments that supply compelling capabilities for particular use circumstances or enterprise fashions. In case you’re nonetheless exploring choices, the next are additionally value contemplating:

• SS&C Blue Prism Clever Automation Platform: Greatest for enterprises aiming to scale robotic course of automation (RPA) throughout complicated operations. It provides clever automation with AI and machine studying capabilities, sturdy audit trails, and centralized management—perfect for extremely regulated sectors like finance and healthcare. Free trial obtainable.
• Quixy: This platform is finest for enterprise customers who need to create automated workflows and {custom} functions with out writing a single line of code. Its no-code platform allows fast growth, visible modeling, and easy integration with third-party instruments. Pricing is obtainable upon request.
• Nintex: Greatest for organizations invested in Microsoft ecosystems akin to SharePoint and Workplace 365. Nintex excels in course of mapping, workflow automation, and doc era. It provides a user-friendly design with highly effective connectors for Salesforce, SAP, and extra. Pricing obtainable upon request.
• BIC Platform: Greatest for firms centered on end-to-end enterprise course of administration—from modeling and execution to optimization and compliance. It includes a trendy UI, detailed analytics, and robust governance capabilities. Pricing obtainable upon request.

Uninterested in repetitive handbook duties? Let robotic course of automation software program deal with them whereas your workforce focuses on extra strategic work.