Image this: It is 2025. Your advertising and marketing intern used an AI instrument to generate content material to your greatest shopper and by chance included hallucinated product options and hit ship earlier than anybody might assessment it.
Gave you a chill, didn’t it?
Because the creator economic system races to undertake generative AI instruments, taking a pause to construct a correct content material governance needs to be the next step.
Fortunate for us, the writer of “What Issues Subsequent” and the founder and CEO of KO Insights, Kate O’Neill, shared her knowledge on navigating the wild west of AI-powered content material creation earlier than your group faces its personal content material disaster.
This interview is a part of G2’s Q&A collection. For extra content material like this, subscribe to G2 Tea, a e-newsletter with SaaS-y information and leisure.
To observe the complete interview, take a look at the video under:
Contained in the business with Kate O’Neill
Your newest guide, “What Issues Subsequent,” addresses future-ready decision-making. Are you able to inform us how this is applicable particularly to content material threat administration?
I feel future-ready resolution making is an idea or a mindset that includes a steadiness between enterprise targets and human values. This performs out in tech as a result of the size and scope of tech resolution making is so big. And quite a lot of leaders really feel daunted by how complicated the choice making is.
Inside content material threat administration, what we’re is a necessity for governance and a type of coverage to be put in place. We’re additionally a proactive method that is past simply regulatory compliance.
The bottom line is understanding what issues in your present actuality whereas anticipating what might be vital sooner or later, all guided by a transparent understanding of what your group is making an attempt to perform and what defines your values.
I feel the give attention to growing sturdy inside frameworks will actually profit individuals in relation to content material threat. And people frameworks needs to be based mostly on goal and organizational values. It is extremely vital to have a very clear understanding of what it’s the group is making an attempt to perform and what it’s that defines their values.
Remodel your AI advertising and marketing technique.
Be part of business leaders at G2’s free AI in Motion Roadshow for actionable insights and confirmed methods to reimagine your funnel. Register now
Speaking about content material dangers, what are probably the most vital hidden dangers in content material methods that organizations sometimes overlook, and the way can they be extra acutely aware sooner or later?
Once I labored for a big enterprise on the intranet group, our focus was not simply on content material dissemination but in addition on sustaining content material integrity, managing rules, and stopping duplication. For instance, completely different departments usually stored their very own copies of paperwork, just like the code of conduct. Nevertheless, updating these paperwork might result in inconsistent variations throughout departments, leading to “orphaned” or outdated content material.
One other traditional instance that I’ve seen so many instances is a few type of work course of getting instantiated after which codified into documentation. However that doc represents one individual’s quirky preferences, which develop into ingrained in documentation even after that individual leaves. This results in sustaining non-essential data with no clear motive. And so I feel these are the sorts of issues which might be very low-key type of dangers. These are low-harm dangers, though they add up over time.
What we’re seeing within the higher-risk stakes is just not having readability or transparency throughout communications and never with the ability to perceive which stakeholders are accountable for various items of content material.
Additionally, with generative AI getting used inside organizations, we see lots of people producing their very own variations of content material after which sending that out on behalf of the corporate to purchasers or to outside-facing media organizations. And people aren’t essentially sanctioned by the stakeholders inside the group who wish to have some type of governance over documentation.
A complete content material technique that addresses these points at regulatory, compliance, and enterprise engagement ranges would go a great distance towards mitigating these dangers.
With content material methods changing into international, how regulatory variations throughout international markets have difficult content material threat administration, significantly with the emergence of generative AI. What particular compliance points ought to organizations be most involved about?
We see this rather a lot in lots of fields of AI. We’re seeing how generative AI, significantly due to its widespread use, is clashing with international rules. Particularly in areas just like the U.S., the place deregulation is outstanding, firms face challenges in establishing efficient inside governance frameworks. Such inside governance frameworks are essential to make sure their resilience in international markets and to forestall points just like the dissemination of unrepresentative content material that would misalign with an organization’s values or positions, doubtlessly compromising security and safety.
We want to consider resilience and future readiness from an organization management standpoint. And which means with the ability to say, “We want the very best type of procedures for us, for our group.” And that is most likely going to imply being adaptable to any market. If you happen to do enterprise globally, it’s essential to be ready to your content material to be consumed or engaged with by international markets.
“I feel specializing in growing worth pushed frameworks that transcend particular rules is the correct technique to go.”
Kate O’Neill
Founder and CEO of KO Insights
We have to assume proactively about governance in order that we are able to create the type of aggressive benefit and resilience that can assist us navigate international markets and altering circumstances. As a result of as quickly as any explicit authorities modifications to a unique chief, we might even see full fluctuation in these regulatory states.
So, by specializing in long-term methods, firms can shield their content material, individuals, and stakeholders and keep ready for shifts in governmental insurance policies and international market dynamics.
I see that you just’re very lively on LinkedIn, and also you speak about AI capabilities and human values intertwining. So, contemplating the steadiness between AI capabilities and human values, what framework do you suggest for making certain that AI-powered content material instruments align with human-centric values and never vice versa?
Opposite to the assumption that human-centric or values-driven frameworks stifle innovation, I imagine they really improve it. When you perceive what your group is making an attempt to perform and the way it advantages each inside and exterior stakeholders, innovation turns into simpler inside these well-defined guardrails.
I like to recommend utilizing the “now-next continuum” framework from my guide “What Issues Subsequent.” This includes figuring out your priorities now, participating in situation planning about possible future outcomes, defining your most well-liked outcomes, and dealing on closing the hole between possible outcomes and most well-liked outcomes.
This train, utilized by a human-centric lens, is definitely the very best factor I can consider to facilitate innovation as a result of it actually means that you can transfer rapidly but in addition lets you realize that you just’re not transferring so rapidly that you just’re harming individuals. It creates a steadiness between technological functionality and moral duty that advantages each the enterprise and the people linked to it.
“Take into consideration the steadiness between technological functionality and moral duty and do this in a manner that advantages the enterprise and the people which might be in and outdoors of the enterprise on the identical time.”
Kate O’Neill
Founder and CEO of KO Insights
Wanting forward, what abilities ought to content material groups develop now to be ready for future content material dangers?
Content material groups ought to give attention to growing abilities that mix technical understanding with moral issues till this integration turns into second nature. The opposite factor needs to be proactive management and actually desirous about how there’s quite a lot of uncertainty due to geopolitics, local weather, AI, and different quite a few matters.
And given the uncertainty of this time, I feel there is a tendency to really feel very caught. As an alternative, that is really the very best time to look forward and do the integrative work of understanding what issues now and what’s going to matter sooner or later — from one yr to 100 years forward.
The bottom line is pulling these future issues into your present selections, actions, and priorities. This forward-looking integration is the essence of “What Issues Subsequent” and represents the talents many individuals want proper now.
If you happen to loved this insightful dialog, subscribe to G2 Tea for the most recent tech and advertising and marketing thought management.
Comply with Kate O’Neill on LinkedIn to know extra about AI ethics, content material governance and accountable tech.
Edited by Supanna Das
