I Tried 8 Finest Video Conferencing Software program: Who Wins?

It began with a single, painfully awkward assembly.

You understand the sort I’m speaking about—half the attendees couldn’t be part of as a result of the hyperlink didn’t work, somebody’s audio stored reducing out, and the display screen share? Let’s simply say it wasn’t sharing a lot. That day, I discovered myself considering: there’s acquired to be a greater method.

All of us need the identical factor from video conferencing: crystal clear audio, clean video, and options that don’t make us really feel like we’re wrestling with expertise mid-meeting.

As somebody who spends most of their day bouncing between digital conferences—staff check-ins, shows, and even the occasional brainstorming classes—I spotted I’d been settling for “adequate” video conferencing instruments. 

I made a decision it was time for a change. 

I began testing a few of the finest video conferencing software program on G2, from the heavyweights everybody is aware of to the underdogs flying beneath the radar. Every device had its personal persona. Some had been smooth and complex, constructed for large-scale company conferences. Others had been light-weight and user-friendly, excellent for small groups or informal chats. And the rest? It by no means made the lower.

Whether or not you’re right here since you’re pissed off together with your present setup otherwise you’re merely curious to see what else is on the market, you’re in the suitable place. I’ve performed the onerous work, so that you don’t need to. Let’s discover the very best video conferencing instruments and discover the one to make your subsequent assembly seamless, productive, and possibly even enjoyable.

8 finest video conferencing software program I examined (and liked)

After I first began exploring video conferencing providers, I assumed it was only a fancy approach to make video calls. However the extra I used these instruments, the extra I spotted they’re a lot greater than that. The perfect video conferencing software program and platforms are designed to bridge the hole between folks, irrespective of the place they’re, by making a digital area for communication and collaboration.

For me, it’s like having a digital assembly room in my pocket—one which lets me not solely see and listen to others but additionally work collectively in actual time. It’s the place concepts are shared, selections are made, and relationships are constructed, whether or not you’re working a enterprise assembly, educating a category, or simply catching up with family members.

However right here’s the factor: the very best video conferencing software program doesn’t simply join you; it makes the expertise easy and pleasant. That’s what units a really nice platform aside. It’s not nearly video and audio—it’s about how effectively it helps how we work together, collaborate, and get issues performed.

What makes the very best video conferencing software program? My guidelines

After I got down to discover the very best video conferencing software program, I spotted it wasn’t nearly ticking bins on a function checklist. The perfect instruments excel in a number of key areas that immediately influence how we talk and collaborate on-line. Right here’s what I regarded for and why every issue issues.

• Collaboration: Past fundamental display screen sharing, I regarded for instruments that supplied breakout rooms, real-time whiteboards, and reside polls to reinforce interplay. Options like reside transcription, closed captions, and translation instruments had been nice to have, particularly when collaborating with worldwide groups. I used to be notably impressed by platforms built-in with productiveness apps, permitting me to share recordsdata, handle duties, or co-edit paperwork immediately throughout the assembly.
• Scalability and suppleness: Whether or not it’s an off-the-cuff one-on-one or a webinar with hundreds of members, the software program must scale. Customizable assembly layouts, participant administration choices, and compatibility with totally different gadgets—from cellphones to a whole convention room programs—proved invaluable. Platforms that might develop with my wants, providing versatile upgrades and add-ons, scored further factors.
• Ease of use: A device can have all of the options on this planet, but when it’s complicated to make use of, it’s not price it. One-click entry by means of shared hyperlinks, browser-based choices (no downloads required), and seamless integration with instruments like Google Calendar or Outlook made an enormous distinction. I discovered that intuitive layouts, clear menus, and clear directions had been important for retaining issues stress-free.
• Reliability: I examined these instruments on all the pieces from quick workplace Wi-Fi to much less dependable espresso store connections. The perfect platforms constantly delivered clear audio and clean video, even when bandwidth was restricted. Many use an adaptive streaming expertise that adjusts video high quality in actual time to keep away from lag or glitches. I additionally appreciated platforms with fast restoration programs for dropped calls, guaranteeing minimal disruption.
• Privateness and safety: Safety isn’t only a bonus—it’s a necessity. I regarded for platforms prioritizing consumer security with options like end-to-end encryption, assembly passwords, and ready rooms to manage who will get in. As somebody who typically handles delicate discussions, I really feel these safety measures present peace of thoughts.
• Worth for cash: Value issues, nevertheless it’s not nearly how a lot a device prices—it’s about what you get to your cash. I discovered that a number of free tiers supplied spectacular performance, together with limitless calls and important collaboration instruments. Nevertheless, paid plans delivered extra superior options like analytics, admin controls, and better participant limits, which had been definitely worth the funding for bigger groups or advanced tasks. 

After testing 20+ options towards these components, I lastly have my prime 8 video conferencing instruments that stood out as sturdy, dependable, and scalable.

The checklist beneath comprises real consumer opinions from the very best video conferencing software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Present on-line video and audio communication between two or extra events
• Permit video convention hosts to switch specs and invite company to conferences
• Supply options like display screen sharing and chat inside particular person conferences
• Supply recording capabilities for future references or shows

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions might have been edited for readability.  

Google Meet is a kind of video conferencing instruments that quietly will get the job performed with out further fluff. I’ve used it for all the pieces from shopper calls to informal catch-ups with colleagues, and what stood out to me probably the most was how effortlessly it integrates into my day by day workflow. 

Because it’s a part of the Google Workspace ecosystem, scheduling a gathering is as straightforward as sending a calendar invite—no separate apps, no further downloads, only a easy hyperlink that pops proper into my inbox or Google Calendar. It’s nearly too handy.

Supply

I spent fairly a little bit of time testing Google Meet in numerous situations—staff brainstorms, digital workshops, and even just a few massive webinars. The video and audio high quality remained fairly stable all through, even once I had a number of members with various web speeds. 

I notably preferred the reside captioning function, which transcribes conversations in actual time. It is not solely surprisingly correct but additionally tremendous useful when coping with accents or background noise. Talking of noise, Meet’s AI-powered noise cancellation did a formidable job of reducing out distractions—goodbye, building noise and barking canine!

One other cool factor I found is how effectively it integrates with different Google apps. I might share Google Docs, Sheets, or Slides immediately throughout the assembly, making it straightforward to collaborate with out awkward screen-sharing struggles. Plus, it syncs completely with Google Drive, so recordings and transcripts (if in case you have a paid plan) are saved routinely with out me lifting a finger.

Whereas the free model is superb for fundamental calls, I rapidly realized that a few of the options I actually wished—like recording and breakout rooms—had been locked behind a paywall. The minimalist interface is nice for simplicity, however I typically wished for extra customization choices, like digital backgrounds that didn’t make me seem like I used to be floating in area. 

Plus, in the event you’re working with members exterior the Google ecosystem, getting them onboard can typically really feel like a hurdle, primarily in the event that they’re not used to Chrome-based instruments.

What I dislike about Google Meet:

• Whereas I recognize the clear design, it feels a bit too fundamental. There aren’t many structure choices, enjoyable digital backgrounds, or branding options that might make conferences extra partaking.
• I rapidly realized that I might want a paid plan to report conferences, arrange breakout rooms, or use superior host controls. It’s nice for fast calls however not ideally suited for extra advanced digital occasions until you are keen to pay.

What G2 customers dislike about Google Meet:

“I personally suppose there’s a want to enhance the structure of the assembly if many individuals are current without delay. Throughout our conferences or any enjoyable exercise, there are often greater than 40 brokers current without delay, but when we attempt to take a screenshot of all the current of us, Google Meet exhibits round 30 of us without delay on a display screen. We are able to attempt to enhance the opportunity of exhibiting extra of us on a display screen concurrently.”

– Google Meet Evaluation, Sunil S.

After I first began utilizing Microsoft Groups, I rapidly concluded that it’s not nearly conferences; it’s about creating a totally built-in digital workspace the place all the pieces occurs in a single place. From video calls to doc collaboration, chat, and activity administration, it goals to be the all-in-one resolution for contemporary professionals. 

One of many first issues I examined was how effectively it dealt with conferences in numerous settings—one-on-one calls, staff stand-ups, or webinars. The video and audio high quality had been stable, however I did discover that efficiency dipped barely when a number of members had their cameras on in HD, particularly on lower-end gadgets. 

Supply

What stood out to me probably the most was the Collectively Mode, which locations all attendees in a shared digital background, like a classroom or auditorium. This function made conferences really feel extra partaking and fewer fatiguing than staring on the regular grid of floating faces.

Groups actually shine due to its deep integration with Microsoft 365. Throughout conferences, I might simply share and edit Phrase paperwork, PowerPoint slides, and Excel sheets with out juggling a number of apps or tabs. This was particularly helpful in collaborative conferences, the place everybody wanted to make fast edits in actual time. 

One other standout function is the flexibility to report conferences and retailer them immediately in OneDrive or SharePoint, making it straightforward to refer again to key discussions with out manually saving recordsdata elsewhere.

Nevertheless, organising and navigating by means of Groups can really feel daunting in the event you’re new to it. The interface is filled with choices, and discovering particular options—particularly throughout reside conferences—typically requires too many clicks. Notifications additionally grew to become overwhelming, with fixed pings from chat messages, channel updates, and assembly reminders, making it essential to fine-tune my notification settings to keep away from distractions. 

Whereas the platform works fantastically throughout the Microsoft ecosystem, I discovered that inviting exterior members, particularly these with out Microsoft accounts, might typically result in pointless friction with entry permissions and compatibility points.

One other downside I observed was how resource-intensive Groups will be. When internet hosting bigger conferences with display screen sharing, chat exercise, and doc collaboration all working concurrently, I skilled occasional lag and slowdowns, notably on older gadgets.

What I dislike about Microsoft Groups:

• In contrast to some easier video conferencing instruments, I discovered Groups’ interface dense with a number of tabs, menus, and options. It typically took too many clicks to entry fundamental assembly controls.
• It was a problem to ask exterior customers, particularly these with out Microsoft accounts, which regularly led to permission points, requiring me to take further steps to grant entry and troubleshoot.

What G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Groups:

“I’ve confronted some efficiency challenges. Groups are inclined to run slower on much less highly effective gadgets. Managing and organizing recordsdata shared inside channels or chats can even change into more and more troublesome as the amount grows. Moreover, the search performance has limitations, making it difficult to find particular content material inside chats.”

– Microsoft Groups Evaluation, Ashrith S.

Webex Suite shocked me probably the most. It’s prefer it took the normal video conferencing expertise and upgraded it with a mix of premium options and enterprise-level reliability. 

It’s not only a device for conferences—it’s a whole platform designed for seamless collaboration, with video calls, messaging, webinars, and even calling wrapped into one cohesive package deal.

The assembly high quality instantly stood out for me. The audio readability was top-notch, even when members had less-than-stellar web connections. The built-in adaptive video decision adjusted easily with out interrupting the circulate of the assembly—an enormous plus when some attendees had been dialing in from less-than-ideal setups.

I additionally experimented with its real-time translation function, which may translate over 100 languages throughout reside conferences. It felt like having a private interpreter on standby and was extremely helpful for world groups.

Webex Suite’s AI-powered options additionally caught my consideration. From Folks Insights, which provides you a snapshot of who you’re assembly with, to gesture recognition (sure, it picks up once you give a thumbs-up or clap), the device feels prefer it’s designed to maintain interactions energetic and intuitive. Let’s discuss its noise-cancellation expertise. I examined it in a busy café, and the opposite members swore they may hear solely my voice, not the espresso machine within the background.

One function that actually elevated the expertise was the whiteboarding device. It’s built-in immediately into the platform and lets members collaborate visually in actual time. No have to open one other app or share your display screen awkwardly—it’s all proper there. Plus, integrating instruments like Slack and Microsoft Groups ensures it suits seamlessly into totally different workflows.

Nevertheless, whereas Webex delivers quite a bit, it’s not with out its challenges. The consumer interface feels a bit advanced, particularly for first-time customers. There are such a lot of choices buried in menus that it may be straightforward to really feel misplaced in the event you’re simply attempting to arrange a fast name. I additionally bumped into occasional compatibility points when members had been utilizing older {hardware} or slower web connections, which led to lag and efficiency hiccups.

One other draw back? The pricing. Webex isn’t probably the most budget-friendly possibility on the market, particularly for small companies or solo professionals. Most of the superior options, like intensive webinar capabilities and deep analytics, are locked behind higher-tier plans, making it a troublesome promote for smaller groups that don’t want enterprise-level instruments.

What I dislike about Webex Suite:

• In a session with over 100 members, I observed slight delays in audio and video synchronization, notably when utilizing interactive options like polls or whiteboards.
• A few of Webex’s standout options, like real-time translation or whiteboarding, aren’t instantly apparent. I needed to dig by means of tutorials and guides to determine find out how to use them successfully.

What G2 customers dislike about Webex Suite:

“I get pissed off with the occasional efficiency issues, particularly when the connection turns into unstable throughout busy instances. Additionally, some options really feel sophisticated and would possibly want further steering or coaching for brand spanking new customers to benefit from them.”

– Webex Suite Evaluation, Kunal S.

Zoom Office is just like the dependable workhorse of video conferencing—it’s all over the place, and for good motive. Whether or not you’re leaping into a fast one-on-one, working a big webinar, or collaborating with a worldwide staff, Zoom has constructed a fame for being quick, intuitive, and rock-solid. 

After I began utilizing Zoom Office, I used to be curious to see if it lived as much as the hype, and I’ve to say—it delivers on most fronts, however there are nonetheless just a few areas the place it might enhance.

What actually caught my consideration throughout testing was Zoom’s AI-powered assistant, a surprisingly vivid addition that makes conferences really feel extra productive and fewer chaotic. This AI assistant can generate assembly summaries, spotlight key dialogue factors, and even recommend follow-up actions—all with out me needing to take fixed notes.

I examined this function throughout a very fast-paced brainstorming session, and the recap it supplied afterward was impressively correct. It captured motion objects and summarized the dialog so effectively that I might immediately share it with my staff, saving us all helpful time.

One other helpful facet was the AI-driven transcription and translation, which works in actual time. Whether or not I used to be assembly with worldwide colleagues or wanted an correct textual content model of the dialogue, the assistant stepped in and supplied dependable transcriptions throughout a number of languages. It’s a superb function for distant groups working throughout totally different time zones and languages.

I examined Zoom’s assembly options in numerous situations—staff stand-ups, shopper shows, and even a big webinar with breakout rooms. The video high quality was glorious, even in high-resolution mode, and the audio readability remained steady with minimal lag, even when members had been in numerous time zones with various community speeds. 

I additionally experimented with Zoom’s Sensible Gallery, which makes use of AI to create particular person video feeds for members in shared areas—excellent for hybrid work setups the place a number of folks is likely to be becoming a member of from the identical convention name room.

One other standout function was the digital backgrounds and touch-up filters, that are surprisingly good. Whether or not I wanted to blur my messy background or improve my look for an vital shopper name, the customization choices had been sturdy and polished.

Nevertheless, Zoom’s free model has a time restrict that may be irritating for longer conferences. Whereas upgrading to a paid plan unlocks extra options, the prices can add up rapidly—particularly for small companies. I additionally discovered that Zoom’s efficiency will be resource-heavy, with my CPU utilization spiking throughout bigger conferences with display screen sharing and HD video enabled.

Moreover, whereas Zoom is understood for its ease of use, the variety of settings out there can typically really feel overwhelming. It took me some time to totally discover superior options like webinar registration administration, analytics, and third-party integrations, which, whereas highly effective, aren’t all the time probably the most intuitive to navigate.

What I dislike about Zoom Office:

• In contrast to some rivals, Zoom doesn’t provide a lot offline performance past fundamental recording playback. I all the time wanted a steady connection to benefit from the platform.
• When sharing a number of screens or switching between functions, I skilled occasional delays and minor glitches, which might be irritating throughout fast-paced shows.

What G2 customers dislike about Zoom Office:

“Zoom can typically be resource-heavy, particularly on older gadgets, which causes occasional lag or crashes. Moreover, the security measures—although improved—require a bit of additional setup to make sure all conferences are totally protected. General, Zoom Office is a superb resolution for bettering communication and collaboration, permitting us to remain linked and productive irrespective of the place we’re.”

– Zoom Office Evaluation, Matt C. 

Slack has all the time been often known as the go-to messaging app for groups, however with its current upgrades, it is evolving right into a full-fledged collaboration hub—together with video conferencing, huddles, and deep integrations with different office instruments. 

After I began utilizing Slack for video calls and staff check-ins, I puzzled if it might exchange conventional video conferencing platforms or be higher suited as a supplementary device. Spoiler alert: it’s acquired some spectacular options, nevertheless it’s not with out its quirks.

Supply

One of the crucial attention-grabbing points of Slack is its Huddles function, which affords an off-the-cuff, audio-first approach to join with colleagues immediately—nearly like dropping by their desks in a digital workplace. I discovered this function nice for spontaneous brainstorming classes or fast alignment chats with out the formality of scheduling a full-fledged assembly. 

The transition from chat to voice (and even light-weight video sharing) is seamless, making it a perfect device for distant groups who need to hold communication flowing with out friction.

After I put Slack’s video conferencing function to the check, I used to be impressed by how effectively it built-in with the remainder of the platform. I might pull up paperwork, share screens, and even use emoji reactions—all with out having to go away the dialog thread. The screen-sharing expertise was exceptionally clean, with choices to let members annotate immediately on shared content material, which was ideally suited for real-time collaboration.

One other main win? Deep integrations with different productiveness instruments. Whether or not it was Google Drive, Zoom, or Asana, Slack made it extremely straightforward to tug in recordsdata, observe duties, and even automate workflows with Slack bots. The built-in AI assistant additionally helped floor vital messages and reminders, decreasing the time I spent looking for issues buried in countless chat threads.

Nevertheless, Slack’s video capabilities nonetheless really feel like an add-on moderately than a core power. Whereas it’s excellent for fast staff check-ins and one-on-one conferences, I discovered that bigger group conferences lacked a few of the construction and polish supplied by devoted video conferencing instruments. 

Managing important calls (10+ folks) can get chaotic with out options like breakout rooms or superior host controls. Additionally, the video high quality tends to fluctuate relying on community stability, and the platform doesn’t provide the identical adaptive decision management as rivals like Zoom or Webex.

What I dislike about Slack:

• Slack lacks superior options like breakout rooms, ready rooms, and participant administration, which I get in a devoted video conferencing device.
• In contrast to different conferencing instruments, Slack doesn’t provide built-in recording for video calls, which implies I needed to depend on third-party integrations to save lots of discussions for later reference.

What G2 customers dislike about Slack:

“I can not say that I dislike it, however the price of plans went up not too long ago. I observed that the cellular app model skilled lagging. Compared to different messaging software program, the standard of video calls ought to be improved when talking with shoppers.”

– Slack Evaluation, Krenil B.

Skype is the OG video conferencing device. It has been round perpetually, and for me, it was my first introduction to on-line video calls. Over time, it has developed from a easy call-and-chat device right into a extra feature-rich communication platform that’s nonetheless broadly used for each private {and professional} interactions. 

Naturally, I wished to see if Skype might nonetheless compete in immediately’s crowded video-conferencing panorama, and my expertise was a mixture of nostalgia and discovery.

I discovered Skype fairly accessible and cross-platform-friendly. Whether or not I used to be utilizing a laptop computer, cell phone, or perhaps a good TV, Skype labored seamlessly throughout gadgets. The set up course of was fast, and signing in with a Microsoft account was a breeze—primarily in the event you already use different Microsoft providers. I examined calls throughout totally different gadgets, and the synchronization was spot on, making it straightforward to modify between gadgets mid-call.

Certainly one of Skype’s standout options is its name high quality, which stays impressively steady even on slower connections. Because of Skype’s adaptive bandwidth expertise, video and audio high quality modify routinely based mostly on web situations, which was a reduction once I was working from a café with spotty Wi-Fi. The noise suppression function additionally labored surprisingly effectively, retaining background sounds to a minimal and guaranteeing my voice was evident all through.

Skype’s screen-sharing capabilities had been additionally stable. I might current slides and stroll by means of paperwork with none important hiccups. Nevertheless, in comparison with trendy instruments like Zoom or Groups, Skype lacks some finesse in collaborative options—there’s no interactive annotation or whiteboarding, which I missed when engaged on brainstorming classes with my staff.

The interface additionally feels outdated, and whereas it’s purposeful, it doesn’t have the polished, trendy look of its rivals. Navigating by means of contacts and settings felt a bit clunky, and discovering sure options (like name scheduling) wasn’t as intuitive as I’d hoped. The shortage of sturdy assembly administration options—similar to breakout rooms, host controls, and participant analytics—makes Skype extra fitted to informal one-on-one calls moderately than massive, structured conferences.

What I dislike about Skype:

• I didn’t take pleasure in utilizing Skype’s design and interface. It appears to be like and feels a bit clunky and old style, and it hasn’t developed a lot in recent times.
• Skype tends to eat lots of system sources, particularly when video is enabled for prolonged intervals. My laptop computer followers kicked in additional typically than I’d like.

What G2 customers dislike about Skype:

“Generally, Skype feels a bit old-school. Video high quality will be glitchy, and the app will be complicated to navigate at instances.”

– Skype Evaluation, Omar S.

BlueJeans Conferences won’t be the primary identify that involves thoughts once you consider video conferencing, however after diving into it, I discovered that it affords some spectacular options that set it other than the competitors. 

Owned by Verizon, BlueJeans focuses on high-definition video and enterprise-grade safety, making it a stable selection for companies that want dependable and safe communication.

When testing BlueJeans, I observed its distinctive audio and video high quality. In contrast to some platforms that routinely downgrade high quality based mostly on bandwidth, BlueJeans prioritizes crisp visuals and Dolby Voice audio expertise, which I discovered delivered a noticeably extra prosperous, extra immersive sound expertise. Whether or not I used to be in a quiet residence workplace or a loud café, background noise was effectively managed, and the voices got here by means of crystal clear with out the standard “tin can” impact.

One other standout function is Sensible Conferences, an AI-powered device that enhances productiveness by providing computerized highlights, motion objects, and clever assembly recaps. I examined this by recording a brainstorming session, and the AI did a surprisingly good job figuring out key moments and making a concise assembly abstract I might share with my staff. This function is implausible for groups that often maintain technique classes and wish fast recaps with out guide note-taking.

Display screen sharing on BlueJeans was one other spotlight for me. It’s optimized for high-resolution content material, so once I shared detailed shows and movies, they appeared sharp with minimal lag. I additionally preferred the flexibility to share particular functions moderately than my complete display screen, which added an additional layer of privateness.

Nevertheless, BlueJeans is not excellent. Whereas it excels in efficiency and safety, the consumer interface feels a bit outdated, and I discovered navigating the settings to be much less intuitive than rivals. Some fundamental actions—like managing breakout rooms or switching audio sources—required extra clicks than I anticipated, which slowed issues down throughout reside conferences.

I additionally discovered that whereas BlueJeans integrates with main platforms like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, the ecosystem of third-party integrations isn’t as intensive as Zoom or Groups. In the event you depend on instruments like Slack, Trello, or CRM platforms, you could discover BlueJeans a bit restricted by way of native integrations.

What I dislike about BlueJeans Conferences:

• Whereas the desktop app runs easily, I discovered the online model to be barely extra restricted by way of options and general efficiency, particularly when managing bigger conferences.
• BlueJeans doesn’t provide native digital backgrounds or touch-up options, which generally is a draw back for customers like me who need extra video personalization.

What G2 customers dislike about BlueJeans Conferences:

“I used to be going through challenges whereas connecting with the shopper assist staff because the wait time was very lengthy to resolve my points. So they need to enhance the assist staff to reply rapidly to prospects’ points.”

– BlueJeans Assembly Evaluation, Rangarajan H.

GoTo Assembly has been a staple within the video conferencing world for years. It’s identified for its reliability and ease, particularly for companies that want a no-frills, reliable assembly resolution. After I began utilizing GoTo Assembly, I used to be desirous to see if it might stand as much as newer rivals with extra feature-packed choices. 

Whereas it doesn’t have all of the flashy bells and whistles, it does ship a stable, skilled assembly expertise, specializing in high-quality audio, robust safety, and user-friendly controls.

One of many first issues I observed was how light-weight and quick the platform is. In contrast to some video conferencing instruments that may really feel heavy and sluggish, GoTo Assembly runs easily even on lower-end gadgets, which makes it nice for staff members who won’t have the newest {hardware}. I examined it on each desktop and cellular, and the expertise was constant, with minimal lag or connectivity points.

The audio high quality stood out as one in every of GoTo Assembly’s strongest options. Powered by their proprietary noise suppression expertise, the calls had been clear, with little to no background noise interference, even once I was in a loud atmosphere. 

I discovered the Name Me function particularly helpful—it routinely dials members’ telephones when the assembly begins, eradicating the necessity to fumble with dial-in numbers and PINs.

One other function I appreciated was the drawing instruments and shared keyboard/mouse management, which made collaboration a lot smoother throughout shows and distant troubleshooting classes. In contrast to different platforms the place display screen sharing will be clunky, GoTo Assembly stored it smooth and responsive, even once I shared high-resolution content material.

Nevertheless, I did discover that GoTo Assembly’s interface feels a bit outdated. Whereas purposeful, the structure lacks the fashionable contact and intuitive design that might make navigation extra seamless. There’s a studying curve, particularly when organising extra superior options like assembly scheduling or recording settings.

The platform additionally lacks engagement instruments like polls, reactions, or breakout rooms, making conferences really feel a bit dry—particularly for bigger, extra interactive classes. In the event you’re planning a webinar or a brainstorming session that requires viewers participation, GoTo Assembly won’t be the only option.

What I dislike about GoTo Assembly:

• I missed the comfort of breakout rooms. This device isn’t ideally suited for internet hosting workshops or group discussions, which is a draw back in comparison with rivals.
• I didn’t discover ample personalization choices for video conferences. There aren’t any digital backgrounds or touch-up filters.

What G2 customers dislike about GoTo Assembly:

“The consumer interface, which some discover much less intuitive than different platforms. One other problem will be occasional lag or technical points throughout bigger conferences, which could disrupt communication. Some customers additionally point out that options like display screen sharing or file uploads might be smoother, and the cellular app doesn’t all the time ship the identical expertise because the desktop model. Lastly, the pricing would possibly really feel steep for smaller groups who do not make the most of all of the options.”

– GoTo Assembly Evaluation, Ana B.

Discover the thrilling world of VR conferencing and uncover how immersive expertise can revolutionize collaboration and connection.