“Dogtor Doolittle” Indicted: The Rise and Fall of Austin Mendoza’s Canine Coaching Scheme

A Canine’s Intuition By no means Lies

Human beings have lengthy seemed to canines as companions, protectors, and household. There’s a purpose we name a canine man’s greatest good friend: they sense our moods, defend our kids, and supply unconditional love. And when a canine bristles at a stranger, we frequently take it as a telling signal of that individual’s true character.

In American tradition, the shortcoming to love canines—or worse, to hurt them—is not only uncommon; it’s unsettling. Compassion towards animals is a pure extension of our humanity. So when tales started to floor a few younger New Jersey man advertising himself as “Dogtor Doolittle,” yielding miracle ends in canine coaching, many canine homeowners had been desirous to consider. However behind the veneer of cute social media clips and boastful confidence, prosecutors have uncovered a darkish actuality of animal abuse, fraud, and exploitation.

The Man Behind the Persona

Austin Mendoza, 32, of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, constructed his repute shortly. Starting throughout The Pandemic, Mendoza branded himself as “Dogtor Doolittle,” knowledgeable canine coach able to curing even probably the most tough canine behaviors. His pitch was irresistible to determined pet mother and father scuffling with aggression, anxiousness, or burglary points.

On Instagram and TikTok, Mendoza’s feed was a carousel of canines obeying instructions, staged “before-and-after” transformations, and testimonials that appeared to show his strategies labored. His confidence—and generally vanity—satisfied purchasers he had authority.

His applications got here at a steep price: two – twelve week boarding packages priced between $2,500 and $10,000 per canine. For a lot of households, that was a small fortune, however one they had been prepared to pay if it meant their beloved pet could be happier and higher behaved.

However prosecutors allege it was all a smokescreen. Mendoza had no certifications, no veterinary background, and no formal animal habits coaching. As a substitute, investigators say, he fabricated diagnoses, used merciless coaching strategies, was aggressive with the animals and his staff, and housed animals in appalling situations.

The Arrest

In the summertime of 2025, after years of mounting complaints, federal authorities moved in. Following a multi-agency investigation, Mendoza was arrested, booked, and charged. He has since posted bail and is awaiting a court docket date. As a result of his purchasers and alleged victims span a number of states, the case has been taken up on the federal degree.

In keeping with court docket paperwork, Mendoza faces prices together with:

• Animal Cruelty (18 U.S.C. § 48) – for the documented abuse of boarded canines.
• Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) – for soliciting funds underneath false pretenses by way of digital communications.
• Conspiracy to Commit Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 371)
• Misleading Enterprise Practices underneath New Jersey legislation
• Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property (18 U.S.C. § 2314) – associated to alleged extortion of animals used as leverage in disputes.

Mendoza has pleaded not responsible. And, because the justice system reminds us, he stays harmless till confirmed responsible…

A Sample of Abuse

The allegations towards “Dogtor Doolittle” are each surprising and constant. 5 people—former purchasers, an worker, and a townswoman —spoke to me, and all corroborated a sample of abuse and deception. Their names have been protected the place applicable.

The E-Collar: A Instrument of Torture

Central to Mendoza’s alleged practices was the necessary use of digital collars—or “e-collars.” Marketed as superior coaching instruments, e-collars ship an electrical shock to a canine’s neck at various intensities. Mendoza required his purchasers to buy them, insisting they had been essential to his program.

However consultants dispute that declare. Analysis persistently reveals that e-collars supply no benefit over optimistic reinforcement coaching. As a substitute, they threat burns, persistent stress, fear-based behaviors, and, in some instances, aggression. Humane societies worldwide have referred to as for his or her ban.

“Austin informed me he was solely utilizing the bottom setting,” one consumer defined. “However once I acquired my Shih Tzu again, he had burnt fur round his neck. He wasn’t the identical canine anymore. He seemed and acted damaged. We later discovered our canine was caged with larger, extra aggressive canines, he was in all probability terrified. It got here as no shock later once we discovered about Austin’s repute with aggressive canines. In fact, he made no point out of this once we’d first consulted with him. He knew we had been determined and smelled our wallets. Our canine is so broken, that man had no concept what he was doing, he shouldn’t be allowed to be round animals.”

This testimony aligns with reviews from different homeowners whose canines returned with burns or open wounds brought on by the units.

Testimony: Neighborhood Nightmare

“I lived close to the diabolical doggy daycare for months,” the resident recalled. “I noticed all of it. Canines had been stored in cages, generally ten or extra at a time, out within the yard or within the basement. You may generally see the cages had been stacked when the home windows had been open, and the canines could be barking relentlessly. They’d sit for hours with no water, their very own waste piling up, I’ve timestamped pictures. He had chickens operating round too, which isn’t even authorized right here. And people poor canines… I’ll always remember their cries.”

The lady supplied movies of roosters crowing at daybreak, pictures of canines pacing in cramped cages, and documentation of foul odors emanating from the property. For a residential zone like Perth Amboy, the spectacle was alarming; and a violation of zoning ordinances, which cap the variety of canines per residence.

Testimony: Virgil

One of many victims, referred to right here as Virgil, shared their story.

“After I picked my canine up, he wasn’t the identical. He had misplaced a lot weight—my vet stated he was malnourished and severely dehydrated. His anxiousness was worse than ever. The vet was so involved she truly referred to as animal management.”

The medical data corroborated Virgil’s claims, noting weight reduction, dehydration, and heightened anxiousness following the boarding interval.

Testimony: Shih Tzu Proprietor, NJ

“He put the e-collar on my boyfriend on the lowest setting simply to point out us it wasn’t dangerous. He truly centered his complete pitch on my boyfriend, he was very dismissive of me for all the time my canine was in his care, it was a little bit misogynistic. However when our canine got here again, he had burns on his neck. He was dehydrated, depressing. Austin had lied to us. That collar was set manner greater. Our canine was traumatized by this collar, he’s fully completely different now from the canine we relinquished to Austin.”

Testimony: Joe S., Shih Tzu Proprietor, NY

One other proprietor, additionally of a small breed, described much more ugly accidents.

“I dropped my Shih Tzu off at what I believed was a protected spa in Previous Bridge. Austin had partnered with them, or so he claimed. Per week later, I used to be informed to select my canine up in Newark. He gave me some excuse about flooding. After I took my canine to the vet, they discovered a gap in his neck underneath his fur from the e-collar. Austin even deleted my Google overview after I posted it.”

This consumer supplied screenshots of deleted opinions and social media movies displaying Mendoza transporting a number of canines in a U-Haul truck after a falling-out with the Previous Bridge facility.

Testimony: The Former Worker

Maybe probably the most damning testimony got here from a former worker who labored underneath Mendoza for a number of months.

“Austin ran his enterprise like a circus, he had the entire Tiger King complicated. He cycled via staff as a result of no person lasted lengthy. He preyed on susceptible individuals who liked canines however didn’t know any higher. I spoke up once I noticed him hurting the animals. He didn’t care. He informed us to deal with the cash. It jogged my memory of Tiger King—chaotic, exploitative, and merciless.”

This worker’s account highlights the poisonous office surroundings and systemic exploitation, extending past purchasers to workers.

The Quick Cat Incident

Mendoza’s downfall accelerated in Might 2025 on the Quick Cat occasion in Freehold, New Jersey, sanctioned by the American Kennel Membership. There, he allegedly entered an aggressive canine underneath false pretenses. Through the competitors, the canine attacked a choose. Witnesses say Mendoza not solely defended the canine’s actions but in addition grew to become combative when requested to go away.

He was subsequently banned from future AKC occasions. Later that night time, he took to social media, ranting that the canine was justified in attacking the choose.

Fraudulent Picture

Mendoza’s on-line repute administration was as aggressive as his coaching strategies. Evaluations reveal a suspicious sample: damaging posts disappeared, whereas optimistic ones surged in clusters, suggesting he bought faux testimonials.

Nationwide organizations, veterinarians, {and professional} trainers have since distanced themselves. A number of confirmed they’d both been straight harmed by Mendoza’s practices or had heard of him via the canine coaching grapevine.

Extortion Allegations

Maybe probably the most chilling allegation includes Mendoza’s ex-girlfriend, a vice principal in Edison, NJ. When their relationship ended, witnesses declare Mendoza retaliated by holding her canine hostage, and demanding $20,000 for its return. Ring doorbell footage captured elements of the viscous confrontation.

The Greater Image: Belief Betrayed

For a lot of pet homeowners, their canines are household. Entrusting them to knowledgeable requires monumental religion. The allegations towards Mendoza strike at that bond. Households who scraped collectively 1000’s now really feel duped. Extra importantly, their canines—harmless, trusting creatures—might carry lifelong scars.

Animal welfare advocates argue the case underscores a necessity for stricter regulation within the pet providers trade. In contrast to human healthcare, anybody can name themselves a “coach,” no matter background or experience.

What Comes Subsequent

As Mendoza awaits trial, the neighborhood watches intently. If convicted, he might face years in federal jail, restitution to victims, and a lifetime ban from animal possession or associated companies.

For now, his social media pages stay largely silent, his once-boastful posts overshadowed by a rising tide of shock. In keeping with sources, he’s paused his dog-boarding operation, however continues to be promoting coaching programs.

Conclusion: Selecting Compassion

The story of “Dogtor Doolittle” is greater than a cautionary story about one man. It’s a reminder that compassion, transparency, and science—not worry and coercion—should information how we deal with animals. Canines usually are not machines to be shocked into obedience; they’re sentient beings who belief us with their lives.

Austin Mendoza might declare innocence till his day in court docket, however for the households who say their canines got here again damaged, the worker who tried to talk up, and the lady who nonetheless remembers the canines’ cries, the harm has already been finished.

Hyperlinks: