Saturday, August 2, 2025

Damon Albarn, Kate Bush, Annie Lennox and over 1,000 artists launch silent album to protest UK copyright AI legal guidelines 

Over 1,000 artists together with Damon Albarn, Kate Bush and Annie Lennox have launched a silent album in protest of deliberate adjustments to copyright AI legal guidelines deliberate by the UK authorities. Test it out under.

Dubbed ‘Is This What We Need?’, the album is totally silent, and is made with the hopes of drawing consideration to the potential affect that synthetic intelligence may have on the music trade.

“Within the music of the long run, will our voices go unheard?” stated Kate Bush in a brand new assertion (by way of BBC). All earnings from the album will likely be donated to a charity known as Assist Musicians.

The efforts come because the UK authorities is planning to make adjustments to copyright legal guidelines – making it simpler for synthetic intelligence platforms to develop and prepare their fashions utilizing copyrighted work, without having a license. They’d be allowed to make use of materials on-line with out respecting copyright if doing so for “textual content or information mining”. This might be allowed until the rights holders selected to “opt-out”.

Members of Radiohead, Bastille, Jamiroquai, The Conflict, and Thriller Jets have all taken half within the silent album, as has Billy Ocean, Yusuf/Cat Stevens, Riz Ahmed, Tori Amos, Hans Zimmer and Max Richter.

The recordings have been made in empty studios and efficiency areas, whereas the tracklist spells out: “The British authorities should not legalise music theft to learn AI firms.”

Talking concerning the proposed change to UK regulation, a spokesperson for the Division for Science, Innovation and Know-how (DSIT) stated that the present regime is “holding again the artistic industries, media and AI sector from realising their full potential”, and that the adjustments being debated would “shield the pursuits of each AI builders and proper holders [to] ship an answer which permits each to thrive.”

Many artists, nonetheless, have warned about how AI utilizing their voice may threaten their careers, and stated that it’s unrealistic to anticipate 1000’s to succeed in out to “opt-out” of it utilizing their materials.

A public session on the authorized adjustments closes later immediately (February 25). Try the album above.

This isn’t the primary time that Kate Bush has spoken out in opposition to the rise of AI within the music trade. Again in December she grew to become the newest to signal a petition talking out in opposition to synthetic intelligence (AI) utilizing artists’ work with out their permission.

By that time, it had already gathered extra momentum as each Radiohead‘s Thom Yorke and ABBA’s Björn Ulvaeus signed the petition, alongside 11,500 others. Extra well-known faces who received concerned included Billy Bragg, Kevin Bacon, Robert Smith, Julianne Moore, Kazuo Ishiguro, Ann Patchett and Rosario Dawson.

Round that very same time, Paul McCartney additionally took a stance, and known as for brand spanking new legal guidelines to be put in place to stop mass copyright theft by AI firms.

Kate Bush in 1978
Kate Bush in 1978 (Photograph by Angelo DeligioMondadori by way of Getty Photos)

The affect of rising AI utilization within the music trade is already changing into distinguished. Simply two months in the past a brand new research shared the stark warning that folks working in music are more likely to lose 1 / 4 of their earnings to Synthetic Intelligence over the subsequent 4 years.

This prediction comes because the annual marketplace for generative AI is presently €3billion, and anticipated to rise to €64billion by 2028.

It has moved into 2025 too, with streaming platform Deezer stating that round 10,000 AI-generated tracks are submitted to the platform each day – making up round 10 per cent of all its music uploads.

Final summer season, Nick Cave continued to be a vocal opponent to the rise of AI in music, saying that its utilization inside the trade is “unbelievably disturbing” and may have a “humiliating impact” on creatives

“Its intent is to utterly sidestep the kind of inconvenience of the inventive wrestle, going straight to the commodity, which displays on us, what we’re, as human beings, which is simply issues that devour stuff. We don’t make issues anymore. We simply devour stuff. It’s horrifying,” he stated.


Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles