OPINION — Because the starting of the battle in Ukraine, I’ve discovered the acquainted rhetoric supporting Ukraine’s proper to self-defense towards Russian aggression paying homage to the discourse that adopted America’s engagement in Afghanistan. From the outset, I nervous that Ukraine would possibly expertise the identical trajectory: beneficiant assist early on, adopted by political fatigue and eventual “abandonment.” The sample of growth of dependency—the place the supported authorities is unable to maintain itself with out steady assist—could be deeply damaging and depart a nation weak.
Regrettably, as a substitute of using America’s affect to result in an early diplomatic decision to the Ukraine battle, President Joe Biden escalated navy assist, contributing to a protracted and more and more advanced battle. Ukraine has since develop into closely reliant on U.S. monetary assist, weapons, and intelligence. But this assist has typically appeared unstable, sometimes threatened by inner U.S. politics. Notably, President Donald Trump has repeatedly signaled a willingness to halt assist, a place that intensified following political tensions between his administration and President Volodymyr Zelensky. This rising reliance locations Kyiv in a weak place—strikingly much like the state of affairs Kabul confronted throughout the U.S.-Taliban negotiations underneath President Trump’s first time period. The U.S. held huge leverage in each conflicts and thus bore a big duty for his or her outcomes. As somebody who was concerned within the Afghanistan peace course of and follows Ukraine peace efforts intently, I see a troubling resemblance between Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad’s dealings with the Taliban, and the way in which American politics are actually shaping Ukraine’s destiny.
President Trump has expressed robust curiosity in resolving the battle in Ukraine and has forged himself as a “President of Peace.” Because the chief of probably the most highly effective nation on the planet, he does possess the power to affect the battle’s trajectory. Nevertheless, the essential query stays: what sort of peace is being pursued? Will it mirror the end result in Afghanistan, the place the U.S. successfully handed over energy to the very group answerable for the 9/11 assaults, sidelining its allies and undermining their legitimacy? The U.S. should proceed with authority—not one other “Doha-style” deal which might ship harmful indicators globally, about America’s reliability as a peace maker, negotiator and at last accomplice.
Consultants are gathering at The Cipher Temporary’s NatSecEDGE convention June 5-6 in Austin, TX to speak about the way forward for battle. Be part of the dialog.
Parallels in Negotiation Dynamics:
There are a number of notable parallels between the U.S. strategy to the Afghanistan peace course of and its present involvement within the Ukraine battle. Whereas the contexts differ, the patterns in negotiation techniques, remedy of allies, and use of leverage reveal placing similarities. These shared dynamics supply vital classes—classes that, if ignored, might result in repeated strategic failures. Three key parallels stand out:
1. Russia’s Insistence with the U.S.-Led Talks:
President Putin’s refusal to interact straight with President Zelensky in Istanbul, insisting as a substitute on first reaching an understanding with the U.S., mirrors the Taliban’s place throughout the Doha talks. The Taliban demanded negotiations completely with the USA earlier than any engagement with the Afghan authorities. This tactic successfully marginalized the nationwide authorities, granting the Taliban better legitimacy. In Ukraine’s case, ought to Russia safe a cope with Washington that renders the U.S. impartial or much less engaged, it might doubtless tilt the battlefield dynamics in Moscow’s favor. We witnessed the same shift in Afghanistan, the place repeated Afghan objections to their exclusion have been dismissed as obstructionist to the peace talks. I recall a number of conferences on the presidential palace in Kabul, the place Ambassador Khalilzad emphasised that “the U.S. doesn’t want anybody’s permission to barter with the Taliban or to withdraw its troops.” This narrative turned a rhetorical weapon to close down legitimate considerations about an orderly and inclusive peace course of.
2. Public Discrediting of Allies:
One other shared sample is the notion of “undermining allies.” In Afghanistan, Ambassador Khalilzad publicly criticized the Afghan authorities—particularly President Ashraf Ghani—for being an impediment to peace, relatively than acknowledging reliable considerations. Ghani’s polarizing management type made him a simple goal, permitting Khalilzad’s narrative to achieve traction amongst Afghan elites and the general public. In Ukraine, the tone of public discourse from U.S. officers, together with the President, has at instances appeared dismissive or essential of the Ukrainian authorities. This public framing could be damaging. It echoes the strain confronted by the Afghan authorities to make main concessions—similar to the discharge of 5,000 Taliban prisoners—regardless of warnings from Afghan management. In each instances, U.S. rhetoric has eroded the morale of accomplice forces and given adversaries the higher hand in psychological warfare. In Afghanistan, this contributed on to the collapse of state buildings and navy cohesion. Language issues. Classes from Afghanistan ought to inform a extra cautious, respectful U.S. posture in Ukraine.
3. Conditioning Assist and Misusing Leverage:
Threats to droop assist for Ukraine, don’t advance peace. They embolden adversaries and sow uncertainty. American leverage ought to be used to finish violence, not danger enabling it. Any withdrawal of assist ought to be tied to the profitable cessation of hostilities and institution of a viable simply peace. In any other case, efforts at diplomacy danger failing, and President Trump’s envisioned “peace legacy” could as a substitute be remembered as a geopolitical failure.
Join The Cipher Temporary’s Nightcap e-newsletter: the easiest way to unwind day by day whereas nonetheless staying in control on nationwide safety.Join at present.
Suggestions:
Primarily based on the teachings discovered from Afghanistan, the next advice is essential for avoiding comparable pitfalls in Ukraine:
Firstly, the U.S. should keep away from the essential mistake made throughout the Afghanistan peace course of—negotiating straight with adversaries whereas sidelining reliable nationwide governments. Within the case of Afghanistan, excluding the Afghan authorities and the Afghan individuals from early levels of the U.S.-Taliban talks severely weakened its authority, emboldened the Taliban, and finally led to the collapse of the Afghan state. This strategy not solely demoralized U.S. allies but additionally delegitimized them within the eyes of their very own individuals and the worldwide group. In Ukraine, the USA should undertake a distinct course. Any peace initiative should place the Ukrainian authorities and the individuals of Ukraine on the middle of negotiations—not as a passive recipient of choices made elsewhere, however as an lively, equal stakeholder. Peace achieved with out the consent and management of either side of the battle—the Ukrainian individuals and its adversaries—will probably be fragile, not sustainable, and short-lived.
Secondly, public messaging should mirror respect and unity. Criticizing allies in public, whereas signaling tolerance or engagement with aggressors behind closed doorways, undermines belief, morale, and credibility. Strategic ambiguity could be exploited by adversaries to sow discord, because it was by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Ukraine deserves a peace course of that’s inclusive, dignified, and respectful of its sovereignty. The world can’t afford a repeat of the Kabul state of affairs—the place allies have been sidelined, and adversaries gaining upper-hand. The U.S. management, as at all times, have to be principled, constant, and anchored in classes discovered from previous missteps. If managed properly, the peace course of in Ukraine might certainly mark a transformative legacy for American diplomacy, not solely because the accomplice to depend on however as a negotiator with making the best deal.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Temporary as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.
