Friday, August 8, 2025

Torn Between Windsurf vs. Cursor? So Was I Till I Went All In

After spending time researching each Windsurf (previously Codeium) and Cursor, the 2 standard AI coding assistant software program, I needed to interrupt down what every brings to the desk. On this comparability, I’ll cowl options, pricing, and sincere person suggestions that can assist you determine which one would possibly suit your workflow higher than the opposite.

Windsurf is an AI-native coding platform by Exafunction (constructing on the previous Codeium). It gives code autocompletion, evaluation, and even an entire AI-powered built-in improvement surroundings (IDE). It contains options comparable to Cascade, an agent that completely understands your codebase. 

Equally, Cursor is a standalone AI code editor from Anysphere. It makes use of AI to autocomplete and refactor code whereas offering a complete coding surroundings with options comparable to multi-line edits and built-in entry to giant language fashions (LLMs). 

Each instruments goal to make use of AI to speed up coding velocity. For those who worth a free or low-cost resolution that integrates together with your present IDE, Windsurf is an interesting possibility. If you’d like a completely AI-integrated coding surroundings and are prepared to pay for it, Cursor is a greater guess.

Windsurf is greatest for context consciousness, person interface, and IDE integration. Cursor and Windsurf carry out equally properly in code technology capabilities and total efficiency.  

Interested by my outcomes? Let’s dive into how I reached there!

*Windsurf has lately joined Cognition. Some options and performance would possibly change with this acquisition. 

Windsurf vs. Cursor: What options are distinctive to every?

Every instrument has its personal distinctive tackle options, even after they goal to resolve comparable issues. 

Windsurf vs. Cursor: What’s comparable? 

Right here’s how the 2 AI code modifying platforms would possibly seem just like some customers: 

  • Language and framework assist: Each instruments declare broad assist. Windsurf helps over 70 languages, together with Python, JavaScript, and C++, and numerous frameworks. Cursor doesn’t listing a number of languages, however since it could import any VSCode extension, it successfully helps any language VSCode can deal with.
  • Group and assist: Windsurf (Codeium) has been round for a bit longer and has a big person base. There’s an energetic Discord and discussion board. The Cursor is newer, with fewer public opinions (solely 4 on G2 on the time of writing), but in addition has a rising person group.

How I in contrast Windsurf and Cursor: My analysis standards

I in contrast the 2 platforms to determine which instrument is extra appropriate primarily based on function availability and usefulness, pricing, efficiency, context consciousness, and IDE integration. 

I went in-depth into product documentation, guides, boards, and opinions of third-party web sites to discover what’s standing behind the superbly designed and embellished web sites. Aside from this, I watched movies the place specialists in contrast Windsurf and Cursor to get sensible insights. What you see on this article is an goal abstract of my analysis. I’ve tried my greatest to maintain the data updated with the most recent. 

Nonetheless, I’ve coated the elemental features of those instruments to make sure that this analysis stays related even sooner or later. 


Windsurf vs. Cursor: How they really carried out in my analysis

On this comparability, I went deep into demos and current documentation on Windsurf and Cursor. Right here’s an summary of my comparability:

Autocomplete and code technology capabilities

Each instruments supply superior code autocomplete. Windsurf supplies multiline ideas and even automated unit check stubs, using fashions educated on open-source code. Its Cascade agent fills in giant blocks of code with a single instruction. 

I discovered the AI code completion function to be extremely intuitive and useful in rushing up the coding course of. The ideas it made had been correct and context-aware, suggesting extra environment friendly methods to write down the code. The chat function provided one other standout side, offering fast help and clarification when wanted. It is like having a coding companion prepared to assist always.

Code generation using WindsurfSupply: Windsurf

Cursor equally supplies AI-driven tab completions and generates code from feedback or prompts. Cursor gives sturdy customization through context guidelines, symlinks, and scaffolding. This permits predictable, constant outcomes throughout giant codebases. Nonetheless, it’d produce surface-level output at instances.

code generation using cursorSupply: Cursor

Winner: Tie

Context consciousness, UI, and IDE integration

Windsurf’s Cascade agent is explicitly constructed to realize a deep consciousness of your challenge. It remembers earlier recordsdata you’ve labored on and makes use of that context when making ideas. Cursor, likewise, indexes your codebase and solutions questions on it. It sees how completely different recordsdata and components of your challenge work collectively. 

Windsurf gives each plugins and a customized editor. Its plugin works inside VS Code, JetBrains, and different IDEs, giving AI completions the place you already work. Alternatively, Windsurf now options its AI-native IDE, which incorporates all vital options. Cursor can also be a standalone software, however it permits importing extensions and keybindings. It’ll mean you can import all of your extensions, themes, and keybindings from VS Code with a click on.

Whereas Cursor does not supply a plugin in the identical method Windsurf does, it supplies comparable performance by its core options and integration with different instruments. 

For customers acquainted with Visible Studio Code, they’ll discover it simple to work on Cursor because it retains the same interface. On the similar time, Windsurf makes it simpler to finish tedious work with its ease of integration into current IDEs. 

Ideally, this comparability can also be a tie. However I personally appreciated Windsurf’s UI/UX over Cursor’s. What’s extra, some person opinions famous inconsistencies with Cursor’s AI, saying that whereas it’s sensible at instances, it could often go off observe for no motive. 

Winner: Windsurf 🏆

Efficiency 

Builders care about velocity and light-weight operation. Many Windsurf customers reward its efficiency. One reviewer famous: 

“Windsurf could be very quick, and the code ideas are very related to the challenge.”

Windsurf Assessment, Sujeet A, Senior Software program Engineer

In an interview, Varun Mohan, CEO and Co-Founding father of Windsurf, conveyed that Windsurf’s engineers goal sub‑100 ms time‑to‑first‑token and lots of of tokens a second for the technology time. Latency issues a ton because it largely determines the willingness to make use of the product.

Then again, Cursor is equally quick, in response to a person’s weblog publish on Medium.

It’s difficult to check these options objectively, as their efficiency largely is determined by the particular use case. That mentioned, I didn’t see any performance-related complaints for Cursor on G2 as of July 2025.

Winner: Tie

Pricing

Each Windsurf and Cursor have free plans. 

Windsurf gives a two-week free trial of the Professional plan. With the free plan, you obtain 25 immediate credit monthly throughout main fashions, together with OpenAI, Claude, Gemini xAI, and extra. The plan gives elective zero information retention, Previews, and one app deployment per day. 

Windsurf’s Professional plan at $15/person/month gives 500 immediate credit monthly and 5 app deploys/day. Staff and Enterprise plans value $30/person/month and $60/person/month. 

Cursor additionally gives a two-week free trial. The Professional plan prices $20/month. It’s appropriate for customers primarily utilizing the Tab with occasional agent utilization. There are two further particular person plans: Professional+ ($60/month) and Extremely ($200/ month). For those who code daily with brokers, the Professional+ plan is appropriate. For those who’re an influence person utilizing brokers for almost all of coding, the Extremely plan will swimsuit you the most effective. 

These plans include particular person limits.

Windsurf’s Professional plan prices $15 monthly, which is lower than Cursor. Nonetheless, it has limits of as much as 500 credit monthly. Cursor Professional prices $20 monthly, however for those who favor utilizing GPT 4.1, it supplies as much as 650 requests monthly. 

Winner: Tie

Right here’s an summary of how Windsurf and Cursor examine by way of AI coding assistant software program options:

Function Winner Why it received
Autocomplete and code technology capabilities Tie Each instruments are able to writing out complete capabilities and even scaffolding a easy software from a immediate.
Context consciousness, UI, and IDE integration Windsurf 🏆 Windsurf stands out as a consequence of its user-friendly interface and expertise. 
Efficiency Tie  Each platforms examine properly by way of velocity and light-weight operation.
Pricing Tie Windsurf Professional plan gives 500 credit at $15 monthly. Cursor prices $20 monthly however gives completely different utilization limits for various AI fashions. 

Windsurf vs. Cursor: Which must you use?

In selecting between Windsurf and Cursor, it typically comes all the way down to your workflow:

Select Windsurf if: 

You like a free or low-cost resolution that integrates together with your IDE. Windsurf’s plugin works in every single place, and also you get a beneficiant free tier that covers primary use. Groups that prioritize privateness or on-premises deployment can lean towards Windsurf, because it gives enterprise self-hosting. 

Listed below are just a few further insights on Windsurf primarily based on G2 Information: 

  • Windsurf has an honest ease of use (86%) and ease of setup (95%) rankings.
  • The platform dominates laptop software program, IT and companies, schooling administration, accounting, and consulting industries.
  • Windsurf excels in interface (81%), code high quality (77%), and enter processing (75%). The platform would possibly wrestle with group (70%), documentation (73%), and accuracy (74%). 

Select Cursor if: 

If you’d like a completely AI-integrated coding surroundings and are prepared to pay for it. It appears like a superb new editor constructed from the bottom up round AI. Its options, comparable to multi-line refactoring and deep code search, are arduous to search out elsewhere.

Cursor had restricted opinions on G2 as of July 2025. Try G2 stories for the latest insights on Cursor.  

Code with confidence

Windsurf and Cursor are each highly effective AI coding assistants with distinctive strengths. Windsurf is superb for fast, low-friction coding assist throughout languages. Cursor, alternatively, gives a richer AI-driven modifying expertise; it’s like having a extremely superior pair programmer in its app.

Which one is best? 

It is determined by your use case and what issues to your workflow. On the finish of the day, select the instrument that streamlines your workflow and let the AI do the remaining.

Exploring methods to expedite coding? Try the 9 greatest AI code mills available on the market.  



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles