This text accommodates spoilers for “28 Years Later.”
When the primary trailer for “28 Years Later” dropped — , the one with the haunting rendition of Rudyard Kipling’s poem “Boots” by Taylor Holmes — there was a lot hypothesis relating to the trailer’s evocative imagery and what it’d imply for the movie itself. Given the truth that “28 Years Later” is a movie arriving 23 years after the unique film within the collection, “28 Days Later,” and 18 years after the primary sequel, “28 Weeks Later,” in 2007, there was already loads to theorize about. Maybe the largest rumors surrounded a very gaunt-looking Contaminated creature glimpsed within the trailer, one who bears a passing resemblance (as a lot as a clearly zombie-like factor can) to actor Cillian Murphy, who performed the heroic survivor Jim in “28 Days Later.” Frightened followers gossiped over the chance, a lot in order that the actor who really does painting the creature, Angus Neill, took to the press to dispel the rumor.
The “Contaminated Jim” idea appears to be a easy byproduct of followers coming down with a case of franchise mind and seeing connections that had been by no means supposed to be there. And but, after viewing the precise full movie, it appears like director Danny Boyle and author Alex Garland are certainly enjoying a understanding recreation of spot the Easter egg as regards to this sequel, particularly the place the character of Jim is worried. Threaded all through “28 Years Later,” there are little bits and items that obliquely recall Murphy’s Jim, and Neill’s Contaminated man could possibly be thought of part of this thread. All of it culminates in a reveal through the film’s cliffhanger ending, which not solely pulls a quick one on horror followers however appears to point that Boyle and Garland could also be utilizing Jim as a captivating side of the collection’ rising mythology.
A story of a number of Jimmys
The opening sequence of “28 Years Later” takes place within the Scottish Highlands through the preliminary days of the outbreak of the trend virus in 2002. A younger boy named Jimmy (Rocco Haynes) is compelled to fend for survival on his personal as his mom and preacher father succumb to the Contaminated. We’re not initially advised the place that boy has ended up when the movie jumps ahead in time, 28 years later, however there is a sense that Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), the daddy of the film’s protagonist, Spike (Alfie Williams), could be the identical boy. In spite of everything, the names are related sufficient, and it is attainable that he might need grown up and easily wished to be known as a variation on his outdated title. The remoted island neighborhood that he lives in appears to have a powerful non secular bent to it as effectively, in order that acts as additional proof.
Issues get extra muddled as soon as Jamie and Spike make their solution to the mainland for looking apply. A location or two that the daddy and son go by seems to have the title “Jimmy” scribbled on it, and the pair come throughout an deserted home with an contaminated man tied up and hanging the other way up with the title “Jim” carved onto his chest. Despite the fact that it is clear from the opening sequence that the boy named Jimmy shouldn’t be the identical individual as Murphy’s Jim from the primary movie and that his grownup counterpart will seem sooner or later, these clues appear to trace that maybe Murphy’s Jim would possibly nonetheless be on the market someplace elevating a ruckus.
All of that’s dispelled within the last moments of “28 Years Later,” which introduces the grownup model of Jimmy (Jack O’Connell), as he and his cult-like gang of Contaminated hunters save Spike from sure dying. It is a bait and swap for a number of causes: it makes plain that Taylor-Johnson’s Jamie shouldn’t be the identical individual because the boy within the opening sequence and that O’Connell’s character is, in addition to gooses followers of the collection who had been anticipating (or simply hoping) that Murphy’s Jim would possibly reappear.
The specter of Jim pervades over the world of ’28 Years Later’
Regardless of the ending of “28 Years Later” establishing this new Jimmy character (whom we’ll see extra of in director Nia DaCosta’s follow-up film “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple,” due in theaters subsequent January), the movie would not essentially dispel the concept of Murphy’s Jim making a comeback sooner or later. Quite the opposite, it might be doing the alternative; if we’re together with Jamie, which means that we have got not less than three JImmys within the combine inside this alternate Contaminated universe. This recurrence would possibly merely be Garland and Boyle having fun, throwing a bunch of similarly-named males into related plights and seeing the variations between every.
Then once more, there could be one thing probably deeper thematically at work right here. St. James the Nice, in accordance with the New Testomony, was the primary of the Apostles to be martyred, and given the heavy non secular themes to the “28” saga, I would not put it previous the filmmakers to make such a reference frivolously. In “28 Days Later,” Jim turns from a mere bicycle courier right into a kind of avenging angel, a change that is actually commented upon by Selena (Naomie Harris), pondering he might need grow to be contaminated when he hasn’t. This notion of the trend virus apocalypse (which is barely relegated to the UK and never the remainder of the world, it needs to be identified) being a catalyst for turning extraordinary people into mythic figures might be seen all through “28 Years Later,” from the way in which that Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) is spoken about as a Colonel Kurtz-like maniac solely to be revealed as a young mystic, to how Jimmy has customary his cult of tracksuit carrying zombie hunters after each the Teletubbies (this system he was watching earlier than the outbreak) and presenter Jimmy Savile, who was revealed to be a serial intercourse offender posthumously in 2012.
On this surroundings, it is completely attainable that Murphy’s Jim has additionally elevated (on his personal or by his impression) to the extent of a legendary determine, being the person who almost single-handedly took out a complete regiment of rogue troopers, in addition to contaminated. Although Murphy is barely a producer on “28 Years Later” and doesn’t seem, it appears that evidently plans are within the works for he and Jim to make some kind of comeback sooner or later. If and when that occurs, I would not be shocked if we get a Battle of the Jimmys or one thing. No matter occurs, I do not suppose Boyle, Garland, DaCosta, and the opposite filmmakers can be denying us our Jim for an excessive amount of longer.
